chr7-117592412-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points: 2P and 6B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6BP7

The NM_000492.4(CFTR):​c.2245C>T​(p.Leu749Leu) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000743 in 1,613,358 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00057 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00076 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

CFTR
NM_000492.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:3B:13

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.63
Variant links:
Genes affected
CFTR (HGNC:1884): (CF transmembrane conductance regulator) This gene encodes a member of the ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter superfamily. The encoded protein functions as a chloride channel, making it unique among members of this protein family, and controls ion and water secretion and absorption in epithelial tissues. Channel activation is mediated by cycles of regulatory domain phosphorylation, ATP-binding by the nucleotide-binding domains, and ATP hydrolysis. Mutations in this gene cause cystic fibrosis, the most common lethal genetic disorder in populations of Northern European descent. The most frequently occurring mutation in cystic fibrosis, DeltaF508, results in impaired folding and trafficking of the encoded protein. Multiple pseudogenes have been identified in the human genome. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2017]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points.

PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.63).
BP6
Variant 7-117592412-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr7-117592412-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 256251.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=8, Uncertain_significance=3, Benign=1}. Variant chr7-117592412-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=2.63 with no splicing effect.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
CFTRNM_000492.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.2245C>T p.Leu749Leu synonymous_variant 14/27 ENST00000003084.11 NP_000483.3 P13569-1A0A024R730

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
CFTRENST00000003084.11 linkuse as main transcriptc.2245C>T p.Leu749Leu synonymous_variant 14/271 NM_000492.4 ENSP00000003084.6 P13569-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000572
AC:
87
AN:
152190
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0000655
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.000576
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00110
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000478
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000611
AC:
153
AN:
250314
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000643
AC XY:
87
AN XY:
135324
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000465
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.000301
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00115
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000658
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000760
AC:
1111
AN:
1461050
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000776
AC XY:
564
AN XY:
726814
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0000897
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000403
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.000422
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.000169
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000930
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000563
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000571
AC:
87
AN:
152308
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000470
AC XY:
35
AN XY:
74472
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000192
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0000654
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.000576
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00110
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000473
Alfa
AF:
0.000852
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000529
EpiCase
AF:
0.00175
EpiControl
AF:
0.00125

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:13
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:2Benign:5
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenNov 01, 2024CFTR: BP4, BP7 -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpApr 20, 2016Variant summary: The variant affects a conserved nucleotide and results in a synonymous mutation. 5/5 in silico tools predict the variant not to have an impact on splicing while mutation taster predicts the variant to be disease causing. It was predominantly observed in the Non-Finnish European subcohort of the ExAC project at an allele frequency of 0.096% which does not exceed the maximal expected allele frequency of a disease causing CFTR allele (1.3%). It has been reported in patients with wide spectrum of CFTR-related disorders (CF, CBAVD, asthma and COPD) as well as in healthy population and often reported as polymorphism. In one CBAVD patient, this variant was found in cis with R764X (Pallares-Ruiz_1999). In addition, according to Bombieri, it does not lead to exon skipping, suggesting it is indeed not pathogenic. Considering all evidence, the variant was classified as Likely Benign. -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesMay 10, 2023- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Aug 14, 2017- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoJan 30, 2023In the published literature, the variant has been reported in individuals with cystic fibrosis (CF) (PMIDs: 24782259 (2021) and 7689013 (1993)), emphysema (PMID: 9921909 (1998)), and congenital bilateral absence of the vas deferens (CBAVD) and oligoasthenoteratozoospermia (OAT) (PMID: 10601093 (1999)). Analysis of this variant using software algorithms for the prediction of the effect of nucleotide changes on splicing yielded predictions that this variant does not affect CFTR mRNA splicing . Based on the available information, we are unable to determine the clinical significance of this variant. -
Cystic fibrosis Benign:5
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingNatera, Inc.Jun 11, 2020- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabJul 22, 2021- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsApr 30, 2015This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 29, 2024- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingMolecular Genetics Laboratory, BC Children's and BC Women's HospitalsFeb 28, 2020- -
CFTR-related disorder Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 27, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Obstructive azoospermia Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInstitute of Reproductive Genetics, University of MünsterDec 21, 2021- -
Hereditary pancreatitis Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Jan 10, 2021- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.63
CADD
Benign
3.1
DANN
Benign
0.44

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs151235408; hg19: chr7-117232466; API