7-143316192-C-T
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_000083.3(CLCN1):c.-21C>T variant causes a 5 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0609 in 1,596,896 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3,545 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.046 ( 220 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.062 ( 3325 hom. )
Consequence
CLCN1
NM_000083.3 5_prime_UTR
NM_000083.3 5_prime_UTR
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -1.65
Genes affected
CLCN1 (HGNC:2019): (chloride voltage-gated channel 1) The CLCN family of voltage-dependent chloride channel genes comprises nine members (CLCN1-7, Ka and Kb) which demonstrate quite diverse functional characteristics while sharing significant sequence homology. The protein encoded by this gene regulates the electric excitability of the skeletal muscle membrane. Mutations in this gene cause two forms of inherited human muscle disorders: recessive generalized myotonia congenita (Becker) and dominant myotonia (Thomsen). Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2012]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.79).
BP6
Variant 7-143316192-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr7-143316192-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 359088.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr7-143316192-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (NFE) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.0678 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLCN1 | NM_000083.3 | c.-21C>T | 5_prime_UTR_variant | 1/23 | ENST00000343257.7 | NP_000074.3 | ||
CLCN1 | NR_046453.2 | n.82C>T | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 1/22 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLCN1 | ENST00000343257.7 | c.-21C>T | 5_prime_UTR_variant | 1/23 | 1 | NM_000083.3 | ENSP00000339867 | P4 | ||
CLCN1 | ENST00000650516.2 | c.-21C>T | 5_prime_UTR_variant | 1/23 | ENSP00000498052 | A2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0456 AC: 6757AN: 148284Hom.: 220 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
6757
AN:
148284
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0452 AC: 11055AN: 244560Hom.: 391 AF XY: 0.0457 AC XY: 6074AN XY: 132868
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
11055
AN:
244560
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
6074
AN XY:
132868
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0625 AC: 90486AN: 1448536Hom.: 3325 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0610 AC XY: 43978AN XY: 721028
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
90486
AN:
1448536
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
43978
AN XY:
721028
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0456 AC: 6758AN: 148360Hom.: 220 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0453 AC XY: 3279AN XY: 72328
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
6758
AN:
148360
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
3279
AN XY:
72328
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
25
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:4
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jan 13, 2016 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Batten-Turner congenital myopathy Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Congenital myotonia, autosomal recessive form;C2936781:Congenital myotonia, autosomal dominant form Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | research | Department Of Human Genetics, Institute Of Clinical And Translational Research, Biomedical Research Center, Slovak Academy Of Sciences | - | The c.-21C>T variant was found in 3 patients with myotonia congenita, one of them homozygous. In one of the heterozygous patients, another Likely Pathogenic variant c.2680C>T was present. The main reason for classification in ClinVar is higher than the supposed population frequency (1 - 5 %). - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at