Genetic Variant ASB10:p.Gly68Gly (chr7-151186927-G-C) – ACMG Classification: Likely_benign (-6 pts)

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -6 ACMG points: 0P and 6B. BP4_StrongBP7BS2_Supporting

The NM_001142459.2(ASB10):c.204C>G(p.Gly68Gly) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000434 in 1,613,298 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as not provided (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000013 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0000034 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

ASB10
NM_001142459.2 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

not provided no classification provided O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.49

Publications

0 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

ASB10 (HGNC:17185): (ankyrin repeat and SOCS box containing 10) The protein encoded by this gene is a member of the ankyrin repeat and SOCS box-containing (ASB) family of proteins. The SOCS box serves to couple suppressor of cytokine signaling (SOCS) proteins and their binding partners with the elongin B and C complex, possibly targeting them for degradation. Multiple alternatively spliced transcript variants have been described for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2008]

ASB10 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

glaucoma 1, open angle, F
Inheritance: Unknown, AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen

ASB10 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -6 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.58).

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=1.49 with no splicing effect.

BS2

High AC in GnomAdExome4 at 5 Unknown,AD gene. Variant has AC lower than other variant known as pathogenic in the gene, so the strength is limited to Supporting.

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001142459.2. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Gene	Transcript	Tags	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon Rank	Protein	UniProt
ASB10	NM_001142459.2	MANE Select	c.204C>G	p.Gly68Gly	synonymous	Exon 1 of 6	NP_001135931.2	Q8WXI3-1
ASB10	NM_001142460.1		c.204C>G	p.Gly68Gly	synonymous	Exon 1 of 5	NP_001135932.2	Q8WXI3-2
ASB10	NM_080871.4		c.272-268C>G		intron	N/A	NP_543147.2	Q8WXI3-3

Ensembl Transcripts

Gene	Transcript	Tags	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon Rank	Protein	UniProt
ASB10	ENST00000420175.3	TSL:1 MANE Select	c.204C>G	p.Gly68Gly	synonymous	Exon 1 of 6	ENSP00000391137.2	Q8WXI3-1
ASB10	ENST00000275838.5	TSL:1	c.204C>G	p.Gly68Gly	synonymous	Exon 1 of 5	ENSP00000275838.1	Q8WXI3-2
ASB10	ENST00000968508.1		c.204C>G	p.Gly68Gly	synonymous	Exon 1 of 6	ENSP00000638567.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000131

AC:

AN:

152228

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000482

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.00000406

AC:

AN:

246502

AF XY:

0.00000746

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0000635

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00000342

AC:

AN:

1461070

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00000275

AC XY:

AN XY:

726878

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0000896

AC:

AN:

33480

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

44716

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26134

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39698

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

86252

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

52712

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.000173

AC:

AN:

5766

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

8.99e-7

AC:

AN:

1111964

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

60348

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.425

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000131

AC:

AN:

152228

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000269

AC XY:

AN XY:

74360

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0000482

AC:

AN:

41452

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

15288

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5190

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4836

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10628

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

316

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

68040

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2094

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.600

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.00

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00000378

ClinVar

ClinVar submissions

Significance:not provided

Revision:no classification provided

View on ClinVar

Pathogenic

VUS

Benign

Condition

Glaucoma 1, open angle, F (1)

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.58

CADD

Benign

9.9

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.45

PhyloP100

1.5

PromoterAI

0.030

Neutral

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.010

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Variant Effect in Transcripts

RefSeq Transcripts

Ensembl Transcripts

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over