7-21735825-G-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1BS2
The NM_001277115.2(DNAH11):c.7626G>T(p.Thr2542Thr) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00226 in 1,610,756 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 67 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. T2542T) has been classified as Benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001277115.2 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0112 AC: 1705AN: 152064Hom.: 34 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00295 AC: 731AN: 247696Hom.: 8 AF XY: 0.00208 AC XY: 279AN XY: 134334
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00133 AC: 1937AN: 1458574Hom.: 33 Cov.: 47 AF XY: 0.00116 AC XY: 840AN XY: 725110
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0112 AC: 1709AN: 152182Hom.: 34 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0112 AC XY: 833AN XY: 74382
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Primary ciliary dyskinesia Uncertain:1Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 30, 2025 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jun 14, 2016 | - - |
not specified Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Primary ciliary dyskinesia 7 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Sep 22, 2023 | - - |
not provided Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jan 29, 2021 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at