7-30755494-G-A
Variant names:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -15 ACMG points: 0P and 15B. BP4_StrongBP6_ModerateBP7BS1BS2
The NM_006774.5(INMT):c.435G>A(p.Leu145Leu) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00157 in 1,604,440 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 37 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0087 ( 16 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00082 ( 21 hom. )
Consequence
INMT
NM_006774.5 synonymous
NM_006774.5 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.101
Publications
0 publications found
Genes affected
INMT (HGNC:6069): (indolethylamine N-methyltransferase) N-methylation of endogenous and xenobiotic compounds is a major method by which they are degraded. This gene encodes an enzyme that N-methylates indoles such as tryptamine. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. Read-through transcription also exists between this gene and the downstream MINDY4 (aka FAM188B) gene. In rodents and other mammals such as cetartiodactyla this gene is in the opposite orientation compared to its orientation in human and other primates and this gene appears to have been lost in carnivora and chiroptera. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2019]
INMT-MINDY4 (HGNC:41995): (INMT-MINDY4 readthrough (NMD candidate)) This locus represents rare but naturally occurring read-through transcription between the INMT (indolethylamine N-methyltransferase) and FAM188B (family with sequence similarity 188, member B) genes on chromosome 7. The read-through transcript is unlikely to produce a protein because it is a nonsense-mediated mRNA decay (NMD) candidate based on translation from the supported INMT start codon. [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2010]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification was made for transcript
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -15 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.82).
BP6
Variant 7-30755494-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr7-30755494-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 784108.Status of the report is criteria_provided_single_submitter, 1 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.101 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00872 (1329/152326) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.03 (1247/41572). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0286. There are 16 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 639 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 16 AR gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INMT | NM_006774.5 | c.435G>A | p.Leu145Leu | synonymous_variant | Exon 3 of 3 | ENST00000013222.5 | NP_006765.4 | |
INMT | NM_001199219.2 | c.432G>A | p.Leu144Leu | synonymous_variant | Exon 3 of 3 | NP_001186148.1 | ||
INMT-MINDY4 | NR_037598.1 | n.375+1556G>A | intron_variant | Intron 2 of 19 |
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00874 AC: 1330AN: 152208Hom.: 16 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
1330
AN:
152208
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00228 AC: 557AN: 243978 AF XY: 0.00161 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
AC:
557
AN:
243978
AF XY:
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000823 AC: 1195AN: 1452114Hom.: 21 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.000697 AC XY: 504AN XY: 722836 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
1195
AN:
1452114
Hom.:
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
AC XY:
504
AN XY:
722836
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
AC:
1014
AN:
33474
American (AMR)
AF:
AC:
61
AN:
44714
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
26118
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
39694
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
AC:
1
AN:
86250
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
43832
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
AC:
5
AN:
5762
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
AC:
13
AN:
1111938
Other (OTH)
AF:
AC:
101
AN:
60332
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.494
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
76
152
228
304
380
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00872 AC: 1329AN: 152326Hom.: 16 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00858 AC XY: 639AN XY: 74490 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
1329
AN:
152326
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
639
AN XY:
74490
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
AC:
1247
AN:
41572
American (AMR)
AF:
AC:
62
AN:
15300
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
5186
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
4822
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
10626
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
AC:
6
AN:
68032
Other (OTH)
AF:
AC:
14
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.502
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
67
135
202
270
337
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
6
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:1
Revision: criteria provided, single submitter
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:1
May 08, 2018
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
DANN
Benign
PhyloP100
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at
Publications
You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.