7-42023572-C-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_000168.6(GLI3):ā€‹c.1393G>Cā€‹(p.Gly465Arg) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00393 in 1,613,320 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 27 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (ā˜…ā˜…).

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.0033 ( 3 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š‘“: 0.0040 ( 24 hom. )

Consequence

GLI3
NM_000168.6 missense

Scores

3
4
12

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:12

Conservation

PhyloP100: 6.06
Variant links:
Genes affected
GLI3 (HGNC:4319): (GLI family zinc finger 3) This gene encodes a protein which belongs to the C2H2-type zinc finger proteins subclass of the Gli family. They are characterized as DNA-binding transcription factors and are mediators of Sonic hedgehog (Shh) signaling. The protein encoded by this gene localizes in the cytoplasm and activates patched Drosophila homolog (PTCH) gene expression. It is also thought to play a role during embryogenesis. Mutations in this gene have been associated with several diseases, including Greig cephalopolysyndactyly syndrome, Pallister-Hall syndrome, preaxial polydactyly type IV, and postaxial polydactyly types A1 and B. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.00919497).
BP6
Variant 7-42023572-C-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr7-42023572-C-G is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 255422.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr7-42023572-C-G is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population mid. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.00399 (5832/1461436) while in subpopulation MID AF= 0.0229 (132/5768). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0197. There are 24 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 3025 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 501 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
GLI3NM_000168.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.1393G>C p.Gly465Arg missense_variant 10/15 ENST00000395925.8

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
GLI3ENST00000395925.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.1393G>C p.Gly465Arg missense_variant 10/155 NM_000168.6 P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00330
AC:
501
AN:
151766
Hom.:
3
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000388
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00315
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00721
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000194
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00188
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00275
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0350
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00506
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00865
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00393
AC:
988
AN:
251492
Hom.:
3
AF XY:
0.00412
AC XY:
560
AN XY:
135918
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000431
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00275
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00764
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0000544
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00114
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00245
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00606
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00505
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00399
AC:
5832
AN:
1461436
Hom.:
24
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00416
AC XY:
3025
AN XY:
727050
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000777
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00284
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00830
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000252
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00136
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00245
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00433
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00437
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00330
AC:
501
AN:
151884
Hom.:
3
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00317
AC XY:
235
AN XY:
74222
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000386
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00314
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00721
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.000194
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00209
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00275
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00505
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00856
Alfa
AF:
0.00486
Hom.:
2
Bravo
AF:
0.00336
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00216
AC:
8
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00234
AC:
9
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.000227
AC:
1
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00570
AC:
49
ExAC
AF:
0.00440
AC:
534
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000577
AC:
2
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00785
EpiControl
AF:
0.00753

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:12
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:4
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and ClinicsSep 29, 2016- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenJul 01, 2024GLI3: BS1, BS2 -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingLaboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)-- -
not specified Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMar 09, 2017This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Oct 14, 2016- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Greig cephalopolysyndactyly syndrome Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMendelicsMay 28, 2019- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Pallister-Hall syndrome;C0265306:Greig cephalopolysyndactyly syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 31, 2024- -
Polydactyly Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Pallister-Hall syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Pathogenic
0.82
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.17
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
-0.010
CADD
Uncertain
26
DANN
Uncertain
1.0
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.36
T;.
Eigen
Benign
0.16
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.34
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
0.99
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.94
D;D
M_CAP
Benign
0.030
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0092
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.76
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.9
L;.
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
D
PrimateAI
Pathogenic
0.86
D
PROVEAN
Benign
-2.0
N;.
REVEL
Benign
0.23
Sift
Benign
0.39
T;.
Sift4G
Benign
0.079
T;.
Polyphen
0.017
B;.
Vest4
0.82
MutPred
0.27
Gain of solvent accessibility (P = 0.0971);.;
MVP
0.74
MPC
0.63
ClinPred
0.020
T
GERP RS
5.8
Varity_R
0.23
gMVP
0.36

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.030
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs35488756; hg19: chr7-42063171; COSMIC: COSV67884644; API