7-44145593-A-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Pathogenic. The variant received 11 ACMG points: 11P and 0B. PM5PP2PP3PM2_SupportingPP4_ModeratePS2
This summary comes from the ClinGen Evidence Repository: The c.1157T>C variant in the glucokinase gene, GCK, causes an amino acid change of leucine to proline at codon 286 (p.(Leu386Pro)) of NM_000162.5. GCK is defined by the ClinGen MDEP as a gene that has a low rate of benign missense variation and has pathogenic missense variants as a common mechanism of disease (PP2). This variant is predicted to be deleterious by computational evidence, with a REVEL score of 0.984, which is greater than the MDEP VCEP threshold of 0.70 (PP3). This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1.1 (PM2_Supporting). This variant was identified as a de novo occurrence with confirmed parental relationships in 1 individual with a clinical picture highly specific for GCK-hyperglycemia (FBG 5.5-8 mmol/L and HbA1c 5.6-7.6 and negative antibodies) (PP4_Moderate, PS2; internal lab contributors). Another missense variant, c.1156C>G, p.(Leu386Val) has been interpreted as pathogenic by the ClinGen MDEP, and p.(Leu386Pro) has a greater Grantham distance (PM5). In summary, c.1157T>C meets the criteria to be classified as pathogenic for monogenic diabetes. ACMG/AMP criteria applied, as specified by the ClinGen MDEP (specification version 1.3.0, approved 8/11/2023): PS2, PP4_Moderate, PM2_supporting, PP2, PP3, PM5. LINK:https://erepo.genome.network/evrepo/ui/classification/CA213723/MONDO:0015967/086
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000162.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- hyperinsulinism due to glucokinase deficiencyInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics, Orphanet
- maturity-onset diabetes of the young type 2Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- monogenic diabetesInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
- diabetes mellitus, noninsulin-dependentInheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
- permanent neonatal diabetes mellitus 1Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
- transient neonatal diabetes mellitusInheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
- maturity-onset diabetes of the youngInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- permanent neonatal diabetes mellitusInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Pathogenic. The variant received 11 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_000162.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GCK | MANE Select | c.1157T>C | p.Leu386Pro | missense | Exon 9 of 10 | NP_000153.1 | Q53Y25 | ||
| GCK | c.1160T>C | p.Leu387Pro | missense | Exon 9 of 10 | NP_277042.1 | P35557-2 | |||
| GCK | c.1154T>C | p.Leu385Pro | missense | Exon 10 of 11 | NP_277043.1 | P35557-3 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GCK | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.1157T>C | p.Leu386Pro | missense | Exon 9 of 10 | ENSP00000384247.3 | P35557-1 | ||
| GCK | TSL:1 | n.*1155T>C | non_coding_transcript_exon | Exon 10 of 11 | ENSP00000379142.4 | A0A8C8KJG0 | |||
| GCK | TSL:1 | n.537T>C | non_coding_transcript_exon | Exon 1 of 2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 34
GnomAD4 exome AF: 6.88e-7 AC: 1AN: 1453796Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 723104 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 34
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at