7-44150961-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely pathogenic. Variant got 7 ACMG points: 7P and 0B. PM1PM2PP3_ModeratePP5
The NM_000162.5(GCK):c.478G>A(p.Asp160Asn) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000274 in 1,461,638 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. D160H) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000162.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_pathogenic. Variant got 7 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GCK | NM_000162.5 | c.478G>A | p.Asp160Asn | missense_variant | 4/10 | ENST00000403799.8 | |
GCK | NM_033507.3 | c.481G>A | p.Asp161Asn | missense_variant | 4/10 | ||
GCK | NM_033508.3 | c.475G>A | p.Asp159Asn | missense_variant | 5/11 | ||
GCK | NM_001354800.1 | c.478G>A | p.Asp160Asn | missense_variant | 4/11 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GCK | ENST00000403799.8 | c.478G>A | p.Asp160Asn | missense_variant | 4/10 | 1 | NM_000162.5 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000274 AC: 4AN: 1461638Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00000138 AC XY: 1AN XY: 727128
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Pathogenic:1Uncertain:1
Likely pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Mar 26, 2018 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Nov 28, 2023 | This sequence change replaces aspartic acid, which is acidic and polar, with asparagine, which is neutral and polar, at codon 160 of the GCK protein (p.Asp160Asn). This variant is not present in population databases (gnomAD no frequency). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with maturity-onset diabetes of the young (PMID: 19790256, 25015100, 32533152, 33852230, 36257325). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 447404). Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) performed at Invitae indicates that this missense variant is not expected to disrupt GCK protein function with a negative predictive value of 80%. Experimental studies have shown that this missense change affects GCK function (PMID: 25015100). This variant disrupts the p.Asp160 amino acid residue in GCK. Other variant(s) that disrupt this residue have been determined to be pathogenic (PMID: 29056535, 30608898). This suggests that this residue is clinically significant, and that variants that disrupt this residue are likely to be disease-causing. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
Maturity-onset diabetes of the young type 2 Pathogenic:1
Pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | research | Geisinger Clinic, Geisinger Health System | Aug 02, 2022 | PM2, PP1_Strong, PS4, PM5_Supporting, PP4, PP2, PS3 - |
Maturity onset diabetes mellitus in young Other:1
Uncertain risk allele, criteria provided, single submitter | research | Clinical Genomics, Uppaluri K&H Personalized Medicine Clinic | - | Potent mutations in GCK gene is associated with poor secretion of insulin. Its associated with milder forms of diabetes, which can be controlled by diet . However, there is no sufficient evidence to ascertain the significance of rs1554335566 in MODY, yet. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at