7-5977677-G-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -5 ACMG points: 0P and 5B. BP4_StrongBP6

The NM_000535.7(PMS2):​c.2356C>A​(p.Leu786Met) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000299 in 150,332 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. L786P) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00030 ( 0 hom., cov: 30)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00069 ( 41 hom. )
Failed GnomAD Quality Control

Consequence

PMS2
NM_000535.7 missense

Scores

5
13

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:3B:17O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.86

Publications

9 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
PMS2 (HGNC:9122): (PMS1 homolog 2, mismatch repair system component) The protein encoded by this gene is a key component of the mismatch repair system that functions to correct DNA mismatches and small insertions and deletions that can occur during DNA replication and homologous recombination. This protein forms heterodimers with the gene product of the mutL homolog 1 (MLH1) gene to form the MutL-alpha heterodimer. The MutL-alpha heterodimer possesses an endonucleolytic activity that is activated following recognition of mismatches and insertion/deletion loops by the MutS-alpha and MutS-beta heterodimers, and is necessary for removal of the mismatched DNA. There is a DQHA(X)2E(X)4E motif found at the C-terminus of the protein encoded by this gene that forms part of the active site of the nuclease. Mutations in this gene have been associated with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC; also known as Lynch syndrome) and Turcot syndrome. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2016]
PMS2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • Lynch syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet
  • Lynch syndrome 4
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Genomics England PanelApp
  • mismatch repair cancer syndrome 1
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet
  • mismatch repair cancer syndrome 4
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • malignant pancreatic neoplasm
    Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
  • ovarian cancer
    Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
  • Muir-Torre syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
  • rhabdomyosarcoma
    Inheritance: AR Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
  • breast cancer
    Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
  • prostate cancer
    Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
  • hereditary breast carcinoma
    Inheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -5 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.014594287).
BP6
Variant 7-5977677-G-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr7-5977677-G-T is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 142421.

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_000535.7. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
PMS2
NM_000535.7
MANE Select
c.2356C>Ap.Leu786Met
missense
Exon 14 of 15NP_000526.2
PMS2
NM_001406866.1
c.2542C>Ap.Leu848Met
missense
Exon 15 of 16NP_001393795.1
PMS2
NM_001322014.2
c.2389C>Ap.Leu797Met
missense
Exon 14 of 15NP_001308943.1

Ensembl Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
PMS2
ENST00000265849.12
TSL:1 MANE Select
c.2356C>Ap.Leu786Met
missense
Exon 14 of 15ENSP00000265849.7
PMS2
ENST00000382321.5
TSL:1
c.1153C>Ap.Leu385Met
missense
Exon 10 of 11ENSP00000371758.4
PMS2
ENST00000406569.8
TSL:1
n.1716C>A
non_coding_transcript_exon
Exon 12 of 13ENSP00000514464.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000300
AC:
45
AN:
150230
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
30
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000490
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0000663
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00850
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000297
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00114
AC:
285
AN:
250066
AF XY:
0.00169
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0000618
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000868
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0000546
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000115
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000655
GnomAD4 exome
Data not reliable, filtered out with message: AS_VQSR
AF:
0.000692
AC:
1007
AN:
1455666
Hom.:
41
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000976
AC XY:
707
AN XY:
724130
show subpopulations
⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Exomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5.
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0000300
AC:
1
AN:
33282
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0000895
AC:
4
AN:
44680
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
26096
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0000760
AC:
3
AN:
39460
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00992
AC:
851
AN:
85810
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
53068
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00139
AC:
8
AN:
5742
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000975
AC:
108
AN:
1107388
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000532
AC:
32
AN:
60140
⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD4 Exomes is highly skewed from 0.5 (p-value = 0), which strongly suggests a high chance of mosaicism in these individuals.
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.359
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
47
93
140
186
233
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
20
40
60
80
100
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000299
AC:
45
AN:
150332
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.000505
AC XY:
37
AN XY:
73322
show subpopulations
⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Genomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5.
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0000488
AC:
2
AN:
40962
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0000662
AC:
1
AN:
15114
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3452
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5074
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00850
AC:
40
AN:
4704
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10346
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000297
AC:
2
AN:
67404
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
2074
⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Genomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5. (p-value = 0), which strongly suggests a high chance of mosaicism in these individuals.
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.349
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
3
5
8
10
13
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
4
8
12
16
20
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0000896
Hom.:
0
ExAC
AF:
0.00126
AC:
152
EpiCase
AF:
0.000164
EpiControl
AF:
0.0000595

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:17Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:5
May 07, 2018
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity.

Aug 01, 2018
GeneKor MSA
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Oct 10, 2023
Institute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

May 03, 2020
Genomic Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Jan 05, 2023
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Oct 19, 2020
Sema4, Sema4
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:curation

not provided Uncertain:1Benign:4Other:1
Apr 01, 2025
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

PMS2: PP2, BS2

GenomeConnect - Invitae Patient Insights Network
Significance:not provided
Review Status:no classification provided
Collection Method:phenotyping only

Variant interpreted as Benign and reported on 04-07-2017 by Invitae. GenomeConnect-Invitae Patient Insights Network assertions are reported exactly as they appear on the patient-provided report from the testing laboratory. Registry team members make no attempt to reinterpret the clinical significance of the variant. Phenotypic details are available under supporting information.

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

The PMS2 p.Leu786Met variant was not identified in the literature nor was it identified in the COGR, MutDB, Insight Colon Cancer Gene Variant, Zhejiang Colon Cancer, Mismatch Repair Genes Variant, and the Insight Hereditary Tumors databases. Furthermore, the variant was not identified in the NHLBI GO Exome Sequencing Project. The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs576055272) as with other allele, in the ClinVar and Clinvitae databases as benign by Invitae and Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano; as likely benign by Ambry Genetics and Prevention Genetics; and as uncertain significance by GeneDx. In addition, the variant was identified in the Cosmic database 1X as pathogenic in a lobular carcinoma and in the 1000 Genomes Project in 9 of 5000 chromosomes (frequency: 0.002). The variant was further identified in control databases in 287 of 244884 chromosomes (10 homozygous) at a frequency of 0.001 increasing the likelihood that this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). It was observed in the following populations: African in 1 of 15242 chromosomes (freq: 0.00007), Other in 1 of 5466 chromosomes (freq: 0.0002), Latino in 3 of 33562 chromosomes (freq: 0.00009), European Non-Finnish in 15 of 110756 chromosomes (freq: 0.0001), East Asian in 1 of 17174 chromosomes (freq: 0.00006), and South Asian in 266 of 30658 chromosomes (freq: 0.009); it was not observed in the Ashkenazi Jewish and European Finnish, populations. The p.Leu786 residue is not conserved in mammals and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) provide inconsistent predictions regarding the impact to the protein; this information is not very predictive of pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time. This variant is classified as likely benign.

Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Nov 17, 2017
GeneDx
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is denoted PMS2 c.2356C>A at the cDNA level, p.Leu786Met (L786M) at the protein level, and results in the change of a Leucine to a Methionine (CTG>ATG). PMS2 Leu786Met was identified in at least one individual among a cohort of 145 patients who underwent PMS2 clinical testing, as well as in an individual with previously negative BRCA1/2 analysis (Vaughn 2010, Yadav 2016). Although this variant was observed in large population cohorts, population data in this region of PMS2 are not considered reliable due to high pseudogene homology (Lek 2016). PMS2 Leu786Met is located in the Endonuclease domain (Fukui 2011). In-silico analysis, including protein predictors and evolutionary conservation, supports that this variant does not alter protein structure or function. Based on currently available evidence, it is unclear whether PMS2 Leu786Met is a pathogenic or benign variant. We consider it to be a variant of uncertain significance.

Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

not specified Benign:4
Jan 23, 2019
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant summary: PMS2 c.2356C>A (p.Leu786Met) results in a conservative amino acid change located in the MutL, C-terminal, dimerization domain of the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0012 in 244884 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.0087 within the South Asian subpopulation in the gnomAD database, including 9 homozygotes. The observed variant frequency within South Asian control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 77 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in PMS2 causing Lynch Syndrome phenotype (0.00011), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of South Asian origin. However, this observance needs to be cautiously considered due to the possibility of the PMS2 pseudogene being captured, although the observance of a total of 10 homozygotes does support the actual PMS2 gene being captured. c.2356C>A has been reported in the literature in individuals with a personal or family history of cancer including colorectal cancer and breast cancer (Yadav 2017, Tung 2015, Roy 2009). However, these reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Lynch Syndrome. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Six ClinVar submissions from clinical diagnostic laboratories and reputable databases (evaluation after 2014) cite the variant as benign (2x), likely benign (1x) and three times as uncertain significance. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign.

Mar 04, 2025
Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Jul 04, 2017
Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Lynch syndrome 4 Uncertain:1Benign:2
Jul 23, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to rule this variant out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign.

Jul 07, 2017
Counsyl
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

This submission and the accompanying classification are no longer maintained by the submitter. For more information on current observations and classification, please contact variantquestions@myriad.com.

Apr 04, 2023
Myriad Genetics, Inc.
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign. Homozygosity for this variant has been confirmed in one or more individuals lacking clinical features consistent with gene-specific recessive disease, indicating that this variant is unlikely to be pathogenic.

Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
Apr 25, 2023
CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal neoplasms Benign:1
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.21
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.31
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.21
CADD
Benign
22
DANN
Uncertain
0.98
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.12
T
Eigen
Benign
-0.14
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.040
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.91
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.80
T
M_CAP
Benign
0.079
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.015
T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.31
T
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
2.4
M
PhyloP100
2.9
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.70
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-1.1
N
REVEL
Uncertain
0.38
Sift
Benign
0.11
T
Sift4G
Benign
0.24
T
Polyphen
0.71
P
Vest4
0.40
MutPred
0.70
Gain of disorder (P = 0.0874)
MVP
0.78
MPC
2.9
ClinPred
0.027
T
GERP RS
2.7
Varity_R
0.13
gMVP
0.67
Mutation Taster
=92/8
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs576055272; hg19: chr7-6017308; COSMIC: COSV56224287; API