chr7-5977677-G-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1
The NM_000535.7(PMS2):c.2356C>A(p.Leu786Met) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000299 in 150,332 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. L786L) has been classified as Benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000535.7 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000300 AC: 45AN: 150230Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00114 AC: 285AN: 250066Hom.: 9 AF XY: 0.00169 AC XY: 228AN XY: 135134
GnomAD4 exome Data not reliable, filtered out with message: AS_VQSR AF: 0.000692 AC: 1007AN: 1455666Hom.: 41 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000976 AC XY: 707AN XY: 724130
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000299 AC: 45AN: 150332Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.000505 AC XY: 37AN XY: 73322
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:5
- -
- -
This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
- -
- -
- -
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:4Other:1
Variant interpreted as Benign and reported on 04-07-2017 by Invitae. GenomeConnect-Invitae Patient Insights Network assertions are reported exactly as they appear on the patient-provided report from the testing laboratory. Registry team members make no attempt to reinterpret the clinical significance of the variant. Phenotypic details are available under supporting information. -
The PMS2 p.Leu786Met variant was not identified in the literature nor was it identified in the COGR, MutDB, Insight Colon Cancer Gene Variant, Zhejiang Colon Cancer, Mismatch Repair Genes Variant, and the Insight Hereditary Tumors databases. Furthermore, the variant was not identified in the NHLBI GO Exome Sequencing Project. The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs576055272) as with other allele, in the ClinVar and Clinvitae databases as benign by Invitae and Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano; as likely benign by Ambry Genetics and Prevention Genetics; and as uncertain significance by GeneDx. In addition, the variant was identified in the Cosmic database 1X as pathogenic in a lobular carcinoma and in the 1000 Genomes Project in 9 of 5000 chromosomes (frequency: 0.002). The variant was further identified in control databases in 287 of 244884 chromosomes (10 homozygous) at a frequency of 0.001 increasing the likelihood that this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). It was observed in the following populations: African in 1 of 15242 chromosomes (freq: 0.00007), Other in 1 of 5466 chromosomes (freq: 0.0002), Latino in 3 of 33562 chromosomes (freq: 0.00009), European Non-Finnish in 15 of 110756 chromosomes (freq: 0.0001), East Asian in 1 of 17174 chromosomes (freq: 0.00006), and South Asian in 266 of 30658 chromosomes (freq: 0.009); it was not observed in the Ashkenazi Jewish and European Finnish, populations. The p.Leu786 residue is not conserved in mammals and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) provide inconsistent predictions regarding the impact to the protein; this information is not very predictive of pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time. This variant is classified as likely benign. -
- -
- -
PMS2: PP2, BS2 -
This variant is denoted PMS2 c.2356C>A at the cDNA level, p.Leu786Met (L786M) at the protein level, and results in the change of a Leucine to a Methionine (CTG>ATG). PMS2 Leu786Met was identified in at least one individual among a cohort of 145 patients who underwent PMS2 clinical testing, as well as in an individual with previously negative BRCA1/2 analysis (Vaughn 2010, Yadav 2016). Although this variant was observed in large population cohorts, population data in this region of PMS2 are not considered reliable due to high pseudogene homology (Lek 2016). PMS2 Leu786Met is located in the Endonuclease domain (Fukui 2011). In-silico analysis, including protein predictors and evolutionary conservation, supports that this variant does not alter protein structure or function. Based on currently available evidence, it is unclear whether PMS2 Leu786Met is a pathogenic or benign variant. We consider it to be a variant of uncertain significance. -
not specified Benign:4
- -
Variant summary: PMS2 c.2356C>A (p.Leu786Met) results in a conservative amino acid change located in the MutL, C-terminal, dimerization domain of the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0012 in 244884 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.0087 within the South Asian subpopulation in the gnomAD database, including 9 homozygotes. The observed variant frequency within South Asian control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 77 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in PMS2 causing Lynch Syndrome phenotype (0.00011), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of South Asian origin. However, this observance needs to be cautiously considered due to the possibility of the PMS2 pseudogene being captured, although the observance of a total of 10 homozygotes does support the actual PMS2 gene being captured. c.2356C>A has been reported in the literature in individuals with a personal or family history of cancer including colorectal cancer and breast cancer (Yadav 2017, Tung 2015, Roy 2009). However, these reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Lynch Syndrome. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Six ClinVar submissions from clinical diagnostic laboratories and reputable databases (evaluation after 2014) cite the variant as benign (2x), likely benign (1x) and three times as uncertain significance. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. -
- -
- -
Lynch syndrome 4 Uncertain:1Benign:2
This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to rule this variant out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. -
- -
This variant is considered likely benign. Homozygosity for this variant has been confirmed in one or more individuals lacking clinical features consistent with gene-specific recessive disease, indicating that this variant is unlikely to be pathogenic. -
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
- -
Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal neoplasms Benign:1
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at