7-5982995-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The ENST00000265849.12(PMS2):​c.2007-4G>A variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.142 in 1,449,408 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 14,424 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.13 ( 1460 hom., cov: 30)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.14 ( 12964 hom. )

Consequence

PMS2
ENST00000265849.12 splice_region, intron

Scores

2
Splicing: ADA: 0.00005852
2

Clinical Significance

Benign reviewed by expert panel B:21

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.223
Variant links:
Genes affected
PMS2 (HGNC:9122): (PMS1 homolog 2, mismatch repair system component) The protein encoded by this gene is a key component of the mismatch repair system that functions to correct DNA mismatches and small insertions and deletions that can occur during DNA replication and homologous recombination. This protein forms heterodimers with the gene product of the mutL homolog 1 (MLH1) gene to form the MutL-alpha heterodimer. The MutL-alpha heterodimer possesses an endonucleolytic activity that is activated following recognition of mismatches and insertion/deletion loops by the MutS-alpha and MutS-beta heterodimers, and is necessary for removal of the mismatched DNA. There is a DQHA(X)2E(X)4E motif found at the C-terminus of the protein encoded by this gene that forms part of the active site of the nuclease. Mutations in this gene have been associated with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC; also known as Lynch syndrome) and Turcot syndrome. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2016]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.63).
BP6
Variant 7-5982995-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr7-5982995-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 91327.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars. Variant chr7-5982995-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.285 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
PMS2NM_000535.7 linkuse as main transcriptc.2007-4G>A splice_region_variant, intron_variant ENST00000265849.12 NP_000526.2 P54278-1Q7Z3Q2B4DGM0

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
PMS2ENST00000265849.12 linkuse as main transcriptc.2007-4G>A splice_region_variant, intron_variant 1 NM_000535.7 ENSP00000265849.7 P54278-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.129
AC:
19434
AN:
150994
Hom.:
1457
Cov.:
30
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0418
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.183
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.184
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.144
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.297
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.178
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.125
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.117
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.151
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.143
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.161
AC:
24903
AN:
154878
Hom.:
2020
AF XY:
0.160
AC XY:
13385
AN XY:
83458
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0369
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.223
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.148
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.286
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.166
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.123
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.141
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.151
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.144
AC:
186768
AN:
1298298
Hom.:
12964
Cov.:
19
AF XY:
0.146
AC XY:
94526
AN XY:
646644
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0330
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.220
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.151
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.304
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.174
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.124
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.137
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.139
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.129
AC:
19440
AN:
151110
Hom.:
1460
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.131
AC XY:
9658
AN XY:
73804
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0418
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.184
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.144
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.297
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.177
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.125
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.151
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.143
Alfa
AF:
0.128
Hom.:
536
Bravo
AF:
0.132

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:21
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:7
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Dec 02, 2014- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineApr 20, 2017c.2007-4G>A in intron 11 of PMS2: This variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it has been identified in 29% (3575/12334) of East Asian ch romosomes by the Genome Aggregation Database (GnomAD, http://gnomad.broadinstitu te.org; dbSNP rs1805326). -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingMayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-- -
Lynch syndrome 4 Benign:6
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDiagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingKCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control CenterJul 07, 2023- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCounsylJun 13, 2017- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMyriad Genetics, Inc.Apr 05, 2023This variant is considered benign. This variant is intronic and is not expected to impact mRNA splicing. This variant has been observed at a population frequency that is significantly greater than expected given the associated disease prevalence and penetrance. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical CenterSep 21, 2015- -
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMar 03, 2015- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesNov 30, 2023- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthMar 31, 2015- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsNov 18, 2014This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Lynch syndrome 1 Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingPathway GenomicsJul 24, 2014- -
Lynch syndrome Benign:1
Benign, reviewed by expert panelresearchInternational Society for Gastrointestinal Hereditary Tumours (InSiGHT)Sep 05, 2013MAF >1% -
Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal neoplasms Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpFeb 01, 2024- -
Endometrial carcinoma Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-PMS2, INTRON 11, c.2007-4G>A, p.?, (Alias:IVS11-4G>A ), Benign (ACMG 5) The PMS2 c.2007-4G>A variant was identified in 51 of 306 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.167) from individuals or families with Hereditary Non-Polyposis Colon Cancer (16472587_Hendriks_2006, 16619239_clendenning_2006); however, control chromosomes were not evaluated in these studies, thus the prevalence of this variant in the general population could not be determined. The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs140788589) “With benign allele”, with a minor allele frequency of 0.1627 (1000 Genomes Project), “InSiGHT Colon Cancer Database”, and the ClinVar database. The variant was classified as a benign variant by the Sharing Clinical Reports Project (SCRP) (submitted within the ClinVar database and derived from Myriad reports). The c.2007-4G>A variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) does not predict a difference in splicing in 5 of 5 different programs. (However, this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity.) In summary, based on the above information, this variant meets our laboratory's criteria to be classified as benign. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.63
CADD
Benign
6.6
DANN
Benign
0.69

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
0.000059
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
0.0060
SpliceAI score (max)
0.020
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs1805326; hg19: chr7-6022626; COSMIC: COSV56219344; API