chr7-5982995-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_000535.7(PMS2):​c.2007-4G>A variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.142 in 1,449,408 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 14,424 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.13 ( 1460 hom., cov: 30)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.14 ( 12964 hom. )

Consequence

PMS2
NM_000535.7 splice_region, intron

Scores

2
Splicing: ADA: 0.00005852
2

Clinical Significance

Benign reviewed by expert panel B:21

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.223
Variant links:
Genes affected
PMS2 (HGNC:9122): (PMS1 homolog 2, mismatch repair system component) The protein encoded by this gene is a key component of the mismatch repair system that functions to correct DNA mismatches and small insertions and deletions that can occur during DNA replication and homologous recombination. This protein forms heterodimers with the gene product of the mutL homolog 1 (MLH1) gene to form the MutL-alpha heterodimer. The MutL-alpha heterodimer possesses an endonucleolytic activity that is activated following recognition of mismatches and insertion/deletion loops by the MutS-alpha and MutS-beta heterodimers, and is necessary for removal of the mismatched DNA. There is a DQHA(X)2E(X)4E motif found at the C-terminus of the protein encoded by this gene that forms part of the active site of the nuclease. Mutations in this gene have been associated with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC; also known as Lynch syndrome) and Turcot syndrome. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2016]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.63).
BP6
Variant 7-5982995-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr7-5982995-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 91327.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars. Variant chr7-5982995-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.285 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
PMS2NM_000535.7 linkc.2007-4G>A splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 11 of 14 ENST00000265849.12 NP_000526.2 P54278-1Q7Z3Q2B4DGM0

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
PMS2ENST00000265849.12 linkc.2007-4G>A splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 11 of 14 1 NM_000535.7 ENSP00000265849.7 P54278-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.129
AC:
19434
AN:
150994
Hom.:
1457
Cov.:
30
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0418
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.183
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.184
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.144
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.297
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.178
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.125
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.117
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.151
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.143
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.161
AC:
24903
AN:
154878
AF XY:
0.160
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0369
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.223
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.148
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.286
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.123
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.141
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.151
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.144
AC:
186768
AN:
1298298
Hom.:
12964
Cov.:
19
AF XY:
0.146
AC XY:
94526
AN XY:
646644
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0330
AC:
954
AN:
28874
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.220
AC:
7890
AN:
35936
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.151
AC:
3704
AN:
24510
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.304
AC:
10923
AN:
35950
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.174
AC:
13533
AN:
77812
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.124
AC:
6241
AN:
50154
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.137
AC:
135398
AN:
986738
Gnomad4 Remaining exome
AF:
0.139
AC:
7547
AN:
54276
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
6729
13458
20187
26916
33645
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance
Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
4784
9568
14352
19136
23920
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.129
AC:
19440
AN:
151110
Hom.:
1460
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.131
AC XY:
9658
AN XY:
73804
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0418
AC:
0.0417846
AN:
0.0417846
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.184
AC:
0.183874
AN:
0.183874
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.144
AC:
0.14422
AN:
0.14422
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.297
AC:
0.297334
AN:
0.297334
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.177
AC:
0.17748
AN:
0.17748
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.125
AC:
0.124881
AN:
0.124881
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.151
AC:
0.151306
AN:
0.151306
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.143
AC:
0.142857
AN:
0.142857
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
824
1648
2473
3297
4121
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance
Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
224
448
672
896
1120
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.128
Hom.:
536
Bravo
AF:
0.132

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:21
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:7
-
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Apr 20, 2017
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

c.2007-4G>A in intron 11 of PMS2: This variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it has been identified in 29% (3575/12334) of East Asian ch romosomes by the Genome Aggregation Database (GnomAD, http://gnomad.broadinstitu te.org; dbSNP rs1805326). -

Dec 02, 2014
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Lynch syndrome 4 Benign:6
Sep 21, 2015
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

-
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jun 13, 2017
Counsyl
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

This submission and the accompanying classification are no longer maintained by the submitter. For more information on current observations and classification, please contact variantquestions@myriad.com. -

Apr 05, 2023
Myriad Genetics, Inc.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered benign. This variant is intronic and is not expected to impact mRNA splicing. This variant has been observed at a population frequency that is significantly greater than expected given the associated disease prevalence and penetrance. -

Jul 07, 2023
KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:2
Nov 12, 2024
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 03, 2015
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Mar 31, 2015
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nov 18, 2014
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Lynch syndrome 1 Benign:1
Jul 24, 2014
Pathway Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Lynch syndrome Benign:1
Sep 05, 2013
International Society for Gastrointestinal Hereditary Tumours (InSiGHT)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:reviewed by expert panel
Collection Method:research

MAF >1% -

Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal neoplasms Benign:1
Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Endometrial carcinoma Benign:1
-
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

PMS2, INTRON 11, c.2007-4G>A, p.?, (Alias:IVS11-4G>A ), Benign (ACMG 5) The PMS2 c.2007-4G>A variant was identified in 51 of 306 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.167) from individuals or families with Hereditary Non-Polyposis Colon Cancer (16472587_Hendriks_2006, 16619239_clendenning_2006); however, control chromosomes were not evaluated in these studies, thus the prevalence of this variant in the general population could not be determined. The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs140788589) “With benign allele”, with a minor allele frequency of 0.1627 (1000 Genomes Project), “InSiGHT Colon Cancer Database”, and the ClinVar database. The variant was classified as a benign variant by the Sharing Clinical Reports Project (SCRP) (submitted within the ClinVar database and derived from Myriad reports). The c.2007-4G>A variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) does not predict a difference in splicing in 5 of 5 different programs. (However, this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity.) In summary, based on the above information, this variant meets our laboratory's criteria to be classified as benign. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.63
CADD
Benign
6.6
DANN
Benign
0.69
Mutation Taster
=98/2
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
0.000059
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
0.0060
SpliceAI score (max)
0.020
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs1805326; hg19: chr7-6022626; COSMIC: COSV56219344; API