7-5987311-G-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_000535.7(PMS2):​c.1454C>A​(p.Thr485Lys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.057 in 1,614,064 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 5,854 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. T485M) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.052 ( 535 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.057 ( 5319 hom. )

Consequence

PMS2
NM_000535.7 missense

Scores

18

Clinical Significance

Benign reviewed by expert panel B:21O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.0320
Variant links:
Genes affected
PMS2 (HGNC:9122): (PMS1 homolog 2, mismatch repair system component) The protein encoded by this gene is a key component of the mismatch repair system that functions to correct DNA mismatches and small insertions and deletions that can occur during DNA replication and homologous recombination. This protein forms heterodimers with the gene product of the mutL homolog 1 (MLH1) gene to form the MutL-alpha heterodimer. The MutL-alpha heterodimer possesses an endonucleolytic activity that is activated following recognition of mismatches and insertion/deletion loops by the MutS-alpha and MutS-beta heterodimers, and is necessary for removal of the mismatched DNA. There is a DQHA(X)2E(X)4E motif found at the C-terminus of the protein encoded by this gene that forms part of the active site of the nuclease. Mutations in this gene have been associated with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC; also known as Lynch syndrome) and Turcot syndrome. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2016]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.004676789).
BP6
Variant 7-5987311-G-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr7-5987311-G-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 41702.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars. Variant chr7-5987311-G-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.332 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
PMS2NM_000535.7 linkuse as main transcriptc.1454C>A p.Thr485Lys missense_variant 11/15 ENST00000265849.12

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
PMS2ENST00000265849.12 linkuse as main transcriptc.1454C>A p.Thr485Lys missense_variant 11/151 NM_000535.7 P3P54278-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0520
AC:
7903
AN:
152096
Hom.:
534
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0181
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00219
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0325
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0628
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.346
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.159
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0877
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0823
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0416
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0465
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0801
AC:
20146
AN:
251466
Hom.:
1895
AF XY:
0.0843
AC XY:
11455
AN XY:
135908
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0165
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0239
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0624
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.359
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.153
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0890
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0423
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0676
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0575
AC:
84022
AN:
1461850
Hom.:
5319
Cov.:
44
AF XY:
0.0603
AC XY:
43855
AN XY:
727226
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0170
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0235
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0651
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.370
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.148
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0891
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0397
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0691
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0520
AC:
7908
AN:
152214
Hom.:
535
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.0563
AC XY:
4188
AN XY:
74406
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0180
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0324
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.0628
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.345
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.159
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.0877
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0416
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.0521
Alfa
AF:
0.0361
Hom.:
49
Bravo
AF:
0.0445
TwinsUK
AF:
0.0367
AC:
136
ALSPAC
AF:
0.0361
AC:
139
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.0195
AC:
86
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.0407
AC:
350
ExAC
AF:
0.0801
AC:
9722
Asia WGS
AF:
0.251
AC:
870
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0407
EpiControl
AF:
0.0414

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:21Other:1
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:6Other:1
not provided, no classification providedreference populationITMISep 19, 2013- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineApr 20, 2017p.Thr485Lys in exon 11 of PMS2: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it has been identified in 35% (3077/8632) of East Asian chrom osomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute.org ; dbSNP rs1805323). -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingMayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Mar 21, 2018- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Lynch syndrome 4 Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical CenterMay 31, 2017- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingKCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control CenterJul 07, 2023- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCounsylJul 07, 2017- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMyriad Genetics, Inc.May 11, 2023This variant is considered benign. This variant has been observed at a population frequency that is significantly greater than expected given the associated disease prevalence and penetrance. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
not provided Benign:3
Benign, no assertion criteria providedresearchBiesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of HealthJul 13, 2012- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesNov 21, 2023- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMar 03, 2015This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 28932927, 28347324, 24728327) -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthNov 04, 2014- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Jan 30, 2020- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsJul 31, 2014This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Lynch syndrome Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAll of Us Research Program, National Institutes of HealthFeb 05, 2024- -
Benign, reviewed by expert panelresearchInternational Society for Gastrointestinal Hereditary Tumours (InSiGHT)Sep 05, 2013MAF >1% -
Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal neoplasms Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpFeb 01, 2024- -
Endometrial carcinoma Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-PMS2, EXON11, c.1454C>A, p. Thr485Lys, Benign (ACMG 5) The c.1454C>A variant was identified in 7 of 338 chromosomes (frequency: 0.021) from individuals or families with HNPCC and Lynch Syndrome exhibiting café-au-lait spots and cancer. (14756672_Thompson_2004, 15256438_Nakagawa_2004, 16472587_Hendriks_2006, 16619239_Clenndening_2006, 17993636_Gururangan_2008, 24027009_Drost_2013) The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs1805323 ) “With benign allele”, with a minor allele frequency of 0.112(1000 Genomes Project) HGMD, COSMIC, “Mismatch Repair Genes Variant Database”, “InSiGHT Colon Cancer Database”, ClinVar database as a benign variant by the Sharing Clinical Reports Project (SCRP) (submitted within the ClinVar database and derived from Myriad reports). The variant was classified as “unclassified” by a clinical laboratory within the Canadian Open Genetics Repository (http://opengenetics.ca/). This variant was identified in the 1000 Genomes Project in 247 of 2178 chromosomes (frequency: 0.113), and in Exome Variant Server project in 350 of 8600 (frequency: 0.041) European American and in 86 of 4406 (frequency: 0.019) African American alleles, increasing the likelihood that this is/may be a low frequency benign variant in certain populations of origin. This variant was identified in the Exome Aggregation Consortium database to have an allele frequency of 0.079. The p.Thr485Lys variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it is not located in a known consensus splice site. In addition, in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. The p.Thr485 residue is not conserved in mammals and the variant amino acid Threonine (Thr) is present in Macaques, increasing the likelihood that this variant does not have clinical significance. In summary, based on the above information, this variant meets our laboratory's criteria to be classified as benign. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.069
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.69
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.63
CADD
Benign
0.0080
DANN
Benign
0.20
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.050
T;.;.;.;.
Eigen
Benign
-1.7
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.8
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.041
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.35
T;T;.;T;.
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0047
T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.0
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
0.55
N;.;.;.;.
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
P;P;P;P;P
PrimateAI
Benign
0.23
T
PROVEAN
Benign
0.46
N;N;.;.;.
REVEL
Benign
0.10
Sift
Benign
0.93
T;T;.;.;.
Sift4G
Benign
0.91
T;T;.;.;.
Polyphen
0.0
B;B;.;.;B
Vest4
0.034
MPC
0.042
ClinPred
0.0026
T
GERP RS
-10
Varity_R
0.046
gMVP
0.21

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs1805323; hg19: chr7-6026942; COSMIC: COSV56219377; API