8-103371787-A-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points: 1P and 2B. PP5BP4BS2_Supporting
The NM_138455.4(CTHRC1):āc.131A>Cā(p.Gln44Pro) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0001 in 1,533,038 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Pathogenic (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_138455.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTHRC1 | NM_138455.4 | c.131A>C | p.Gln44Pro | missense_variant | 1/4 | ENST00000330295.10 | NP_612464.1 | |
CTHRC1 | XM_011516824.3 | c.131A>C | p.Gln44Pro | missense_variant | 1/3 | XP_011515126.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTHRC1 | ENST00000330295.10 | c.131A>C | p.Gln44Pro | missense_variant | 1/4 | 1 | NM_138455.4 | ENSP00000330523 | P1 | |
CTHRC1 | ENST00000415886.2 | c.131A>C | p.Gln44Pro | missense_variant | 1/2 | 2 | ENSP00000416045 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000986 AC: 15AN: 152186Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000231 AC: 3AN: 129726Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000143 AC XY: 1AN XY: 69910
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000101 AC: 139AN: 1380852Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000750 AC XY: 51AN XY: 680368
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000986 AC: 15AN: 152186Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000807 AC XY: 6AN XY: 74332
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Barrett esophagus/esophageal adenocarcinoma Pathogenic:1
Pathogenic, no assertion criteria provided | literature only | OMIM | Jul 27, 2011 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at