8-138826669-T-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_StrongBA1
The NM_152888.3(COL22A1):c.958A>G(p.Ser320Gly) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.809 in 1,612,904 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 528,102 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. S320C) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_152888.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_152888.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COL22A1 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.958A>G | p.Ser320Gly | missense | Exon 6 of 65 | ENSP00000303153.6 | Q8NFW1-1 | ||
| COL22A1 | c.958A>G | p.Ser320Gly | missense | Exon 6 of 64 | ENSP00000573649.1 | ||||
| COL22A1 | c.958A>G | p.Ser320Gly | missense | Exon 6 of 62 | ENSP00000573650.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.820 AC: 124519AN: 151838Hom.: 51116 Cov.: 29 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.814 AC: 204483AN: 251314 AF XY: 0.815 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.808 AC: 1179769AN: 1460948Hom.: 476925 Cov.: 41 AF XY: 0.809 AC XY: 587997AN XY: 726804 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.820 AC: 124633AN: 151956Hom.: 51177 Cov.: 29 AF XY: 0.820 AC XY: 60905AN XY: 74272 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at