8-15540158-G-A
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6_ModerateBA1
The NM_178234.2(TUSC3):c.-273G>A variant causes a 5 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00502 in 417,842 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 53 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0033 ( 7 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0060 ( 46 hom. )
Consequence
TUSC3
NM_178234.2 5_prime_UTR
NM_178234.2 5_prime_UTR
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -4.84
Genes affected
TUSC3 (HGNC:30242): (tumor suppressor candidate 3) This gene encodes a protein that has been associated with several biological functions including cellular magnesium uptake, protein glycosylation and embryonic development. This protein localizes to the endoplasmic reticulum and acts as a component of the oligosaccharyl transferase complex which is responsible for N-linked protein glycosylation. This gene is a candidate tumor suppressor gene. Homozygous mutations in this gene are associated with autosomal recessive nonsyndromic mental retardation-7 and in the proliferation and invasiveness of several cancers including metastatic pancreatic cancer, ovarian cancer and glioblastoma multiform. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2017]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.79).
BP6
Variant 8-15540158-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr8-15540158-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 362295.Status of the report is criteria_provided_single_submitter, 1 stars.
BA1
GnomAdExome4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.0653 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TUSC3 | NM_178234.2 | c.-273G>A | 5_prime_UTR_variant | 1/10 | |||
TUSC3 | NM_001413669.1 | c.-30-82922G>A | intron_variant | ||||
TUSC3 | NM_001413670.1 | c.79-82922G>A | intron_variant |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TUSC3 | ENST00000503191.5 | n.189+56675G>A | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant | 3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00332 AC: 506AN: 152220Hom.: 8 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
506
AN:
152220
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00598 AC: 1589AN: 265506Hom.: 46 AF XY: 0.00570 AC XY: 777AN XY: 136344
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
1589
AN:
265506
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
777
AN XY:
136344
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00333 AC: 507AN: 152336Hom.: 7 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00397 AC XY: 296AN XY: 74488
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
507
AN:
152336
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
296
AN XY:
74488
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
103
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:1
Revision: criteria provided, single submitter
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Congenital disorder of glycosylation Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at