8-23022949-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 1 ACMG points: 2P and 1B. PM2BP4
The NM_003842.5(TNFRSF10B):c.1045G>A(p.Val349Met) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000658 in 152,072 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. V349L) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_003842.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- head and neck squamous cell carcinomaInheritance: Unknown, AD, AR Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics, PanelApp Australia
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 1 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_003842.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TNFRSF10B | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.1045G>A | p.Val349Met | missense | Exon 9 of 9 | ENSP00000276431.4 | O14763-1 | ||
| TNFRSF10B | TSL:1 | c.958G>A | p.Val320Met | missense | Exon 10 of 10 | ENSP00000317859.3 | O14763-2 | ||
| TNFRSF10B | TSL:1 | n.512G>A | non_coding_transcript_exon | Exon 4 of 4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000658 AC: 1AN: 152072Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 33
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000658 AC: 1AN: 152072Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000135 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74268 show subpopulations
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at