8-27511849-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4_StrongBP6_ModerateBS2
The NM_001979.6(EPHX2):c.674C>T(p.Pro225Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000356 in 1,614,002 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 4 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★). Another nucleotide change resulting in same amino acid change has been previously reported as Likely benignin UniProt.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001979.6 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPHX2 | NM_001979.6 | c.674C>T | p.Pro225Leu | missense_variant | 6/19 | ENST00000521400.6 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPHX2 | ENST00000521400.6 | c.674C>T | p.Pro225Leu | missense_variant | 6/19 | 1 | NM_001979.6 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000237 AC: 36AN: 152160Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00174 AC: 438AN: 251486Hom.: 4 AF XY: 0.00121 AC XY: 165AN XY: 135918
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000368 AC: 538AN: 1461842Hom.: 4 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000296 AC XY: 215AN XY: 727230
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000237 AC: 36AN: 152160Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.000188 AC XY: 14AN XY: 74340
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
EPHX2-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Jan 03, 2020 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at