8-30132685-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6_ModerateBS1BS2
The NM_001100916.2(MBOAT4):c.566G>A(p.Arg189His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00129 in 1,551,722 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 26 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001100916.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MBOAT4 | NM_001100916.2 | c.566G>A | p.Arg189His | missense_variant | 3/3 | ENST00000320542.4 | |
LEPROTL1 | NM_001128208.2 | c.280-4587C>T | intron_variant |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MBOAT4 | ENST00000320542.4 | c.566G>A | p.Arg189His | missense_variant | 3/3 | 1 | NM_001100916.2 | P1 | |
LEPROTL1 | ENST00000442880.6 | c.394+196C>T | intron_variant | 2 | |||||
LEPROTL1 | ENST00000523116.5 | c.280-4587C>T | intron_variant | 2 | |||||
LEPROTL1 | ENST00000520739.5 | c.279+28199C>T | intron_variant, NMD_transcript_variant | 4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00661 AC: 1005AN: 152150Hom.: 11 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00148 AC: 231AN: 156464Hom.: 3 AF XY: 0.00100 AC XY: 83AN XY: 82898
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000707 AC: 989AN: 1399454Hom.: 15 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.000627 AC XY: 433AN XY: 690238
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00660 AC: 1005AN: 152268Hom.: 11 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00674 AC XY: 502AN XY: 74464
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Jun 19, 2018 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at