8-64798529-G-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 0 ACMG points: 2P and 2B. PM2BP4_Moderate
The NM_004820.5(CYP7B1):c.59C>A(p.Pro20Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000266 in 1,501,264 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. P20L) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_004820.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- congenital bile acid synthesis defect 3Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet
- hereditary spastic paraplegia 5AInheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet, Genomics England PanelApp
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 0 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_004820.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CYP7B1 | NM_004820.5 | MANE Select | c.59C>A | p.Pro20Gln | missense | Exon 1 of 6 | NP_004811.1 | ||
| CYP7B1 | NM_001324112.2 | c.59C>A | p.Pro20Gln | missense | Exon 1 of 7 | NP_001311041.1 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CYP7B1 | ENST00000310193.4 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.59C>A | p.Pro20Gln | missense | Exon 1 of 6 | ENSP00000310721.3 | ||
| ENSG00000287998 | ENST00000833571.1 | n.66G>T | non_coding_transcript_exon | Exon 1 of 2 | |||||
| ENSG00000287998 | ENST00000833563.1 | n.-85G>T | upstream_gene | N/A |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152212Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000309 AC: 3AN: 97140 AF XY: 0.0000366 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000222 AC: 3AN: 1349052Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00000301 AC XY: 2AN XY: 665468 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152212Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 74362 show subpopulations
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Spastic paraplegia Uncertain:1
This sequence change replaces proline, which is neutral and non-polar, with glutamine, which is neutral and polar, at codon 20 of the CYP7B1 protein (p.Pro20Gln). The frequency data for this variant in the population databases is considered unreliable, as metrics indicate poor data quality at this position in the gnomAD database. This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with CYP7B1-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 1806875). An algorithm developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function outputs the following: PolyPhen-2: "Benign". The glutamine amino acid residue is found in multiple mammalian species, which suggests that this missense change does not adversely affect protein function. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance.
not provided Uncertain:1
Available data are insufficient to determine the clinical significance of the variant at this time. The frequency of this variant in the general population is uninformative in assessment of its pathogenicity. (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org) Computational tools predict that this variant is not damaging.
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at