8-89943355-A-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1
The ENST00000265433.8(NBN):āc.2082T>Gā(p.Pro694=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00415 in 1,603,120 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 226 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (ā ā ). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. P694P) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
ENST00000265433.8 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NBN | NM_002485.5 | c.2082T>G | p.Pro694= | synonymous_variant | 14/16 | ENST00000265433.8 | NP_002476.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NBN | ENST00000265433.8 | c.2082T>G | p.Pro694= | synonymous_variant | 14/16 | 1 | NM_002485.5 | ENSP00000265433 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0216 AC: 3284AN: 152170Hom.: 113 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00612 AC: 1537AN: 251278Hom.: 60 AF XY: 0.00434 AC XY: 590AN XY: 135808
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00231 AC: 3358AN: 1450832Hom.: 113 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00202 AC XY: 1456AN XY: 722576
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0216 AC: 3290AN: 152288Hom.: 113 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0209 AC XY: 1556AN XY: 74484
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:4
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The NBN p.Pro694= variant was not identified in the literature nor was it identified in the Zhejiang Colon Cancer Database. The variant was identified in the following databases: dbSNP (ID: rs7823648) as other, ClinVar (classified as benign by Ambry genetics, Invitae; classified as likely benign by Illumina), and LOVD 3.0. The variant was identified in control databases in 2107 (77 homozygous) of 277000 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.0076 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Consortium Feb 27, 2017). The variant was identified in the following populations at a frequency greater than 1%: African in 1843 of 24028 chromosomes (freq: 0.077). The p.Pro694= variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not result in a change of amino acid and is not located in a known consensus splice site. In addition, in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information this variant meets our laboratory's criteria to be classified as benign. - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Feb 02, 2017 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Jul 09, 2020 | - - |
not provided Benign:4
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Nov 22, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 03, 2015 | - - |
Microcephaly, normal intelligence and immunodeficiency Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Sep 16, 2020 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | True Health Diagnostics | Sep 11, 2017 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Nov 20, 2014 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Acute lymphoid leukemia Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center | Jul 07, 2023 | - - |
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | National Health Laboratory Service, Universitas Academic Hospital and University of the Free State | Apr 19, 2022 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at