8-89970463-G-A
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_002485.5(NBN):c.797C>T(p.Pro266Leu) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00163 in 1,613,812 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 41 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0088 ( 20 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00088 ( 21 hom. )
Consequence
NBN
NM_002485.5 missense
NM_002485.5 missense
Scores
3
6
9
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 6.34
Genes affected
NBN (HGNC:7652): (nibrin) Mutations in this gene are associated with Nijmegen breakage syndrome, an autosomal recessive chromosomal instability syndrome characterized by microcephaly, growth retardation, immunodeficiency, and cancer predisposition. The encoded protein is a member of the MRE11/RAD50 double-strand break repair complex which consists of 5 proteins. This gene product is thought to be involved in DNA double-strand break repair and DNA damage-induced checkpoint activation. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.008543104).
BP6
Variant 8-89970463-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr8-89970463-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 134878.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr8-89970463-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00878 (1336/152126) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0311 (1288/41450). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0297. There are 20 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 595 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 20 AD,AR gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NBN | NM_002485.5 | c.797C>T | p.Pro266Leu | missense_variant | 7/16 | ENST00000265433.8 | NP_002476.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NBN | ENST00000265433.8 | c.797C>T | p.Pro266Leu | missense_variant | 7/16 | 1 | NM_002485.5 | ENSP00000265433.4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00877 AC: 1333AN: 152008Hom.: 20 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
1333
AN:
152008
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00219 AC: 550AN: 251250Hom.: 11 AF XY: 0.00158 AC XY: 214AN XY: 135790
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
550
AN:
251250
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
214
AN XY:
135790
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000884 AC: 1292AN: 1461686Hom.: 21 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000794 AC XY: 577AN XY: 727150
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
1292
AN:
1461686
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
577
AN XY:
727150
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00878 AC: 1336AN: 152126Hom.: 20 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00800 AC XY: 595AN XY: 74392
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
1336
AN:
152126
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
595
AN XY:
74392
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
ESP6500AA
AF:
AC:
133
ESP6500EA
AF:
AC:
0
ExAC
AF:
AC:
311
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
2
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:17Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:4Other:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Oct 11, 2017 | - - |
not provided, no classification provided | reference population | ITMI | Sep 19, 2013 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Oct 28, 2020 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Feb 05, 2014 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The NBN p.Pro266Leu variant was identified in 14 of 2874 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.005) from individuals or families with various types of cancer and was present in 4 of 1362 control chromosomes (frequency: 0.003) from healthy individuals (Berg 2013, Bodian 2014, Desjardins 2009, Yurgelun 2015). The variant was also identified in the following databases: dbSNP (ID: rs769420) as "With Benign allele", ClinVar (5x benign), Clinvitae (4x benign), and the Zhejiang Colon Cancer Database (1x). The variant was not identified in Cosmic or the LOVD 3.0 database. The variant was identified in control databases in 771 of 276952 chromosomes (11 homozygous) at a frequency of 0.003 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). Breakdown of the observations by population include African in 705 of 24006 chromosomes (freq: 0.03), Other in 5 of 6454 chromosomes (freq: 0.0008), Latino in 44 of 34382 chromosomes (freq: 0.001), European in 4 of 126556 chromosomes (freq: 0.00003), East Asian in 9 of 18864 chromosomes (freq: 0.0005), and South Asian in 4 of 30776 chromosomes (freq: 0.0001). The variant was not observed in the Ashkenazi Jewish or Finnish populations. Various studies utilizing computational algorithms, personal disease history, and family disease history have been performed; most of these studies conclude the variant is not associated with cancer (Berg 2013, Berardinelli 2013, Bodian 2014, Desjardins 2009, Gao 2013, Yurgelun 2015). The p.Pro266 residue is conserved in mammals but not in more distantly related organisms, and four out of five computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) suggest that the leucine variant may impact the protein; however, this information is not predictive enough to assume pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. - |
not provided Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics | Dec 30, 2016 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Jul 23, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | May 01, 2024 | NBN: BP4, BS1, BS2 - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Microcephaly, normal intelligence and immunodeficiency Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 28, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to rule this variant out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Nov 12, 2019 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | May 21, 2020 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Dec 12, 2014 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | True Health Diagnostics | Feb 20, 2018 | - - |
Aplastic anemia;C0023449:Acute lymphoid leukemia;C0398791:Microcephaly, normal intelligence and immunodeficiency Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | Oct 07, 2021 | - - |
Acute lymphoid leukemia Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center | Jul 07, 2023 | - - |
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | National Health Laboratory Service, Universitas Academic Hospital and University of the Free State | Apr 19, 2022 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Uncertain
DANN
Uncertain
DEOGEN2
Benign
T;T
Eigen
Pathogenic
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
D;D
MetaRNN
Benign
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
T
MutationAssessor
Pathogenic
M;.
PrimateAI
Benign
T
PROVEAN
Pathogenic
D;D
REVEL
Benign
Sift
Uncertain
D;D
Sift4G
Uncertain
D;D
Polyphen
D;.
Vest4
MVP
MPC
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at