rs769420
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_002485.5(NBN):c.797C>T(p.Pro266Leu) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00163 in 1,613,812 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 41 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. P266A) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_002485.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NBN | NM_002485.5 | c.797C>T | p.Pro266Leu | missense_variant | 7/16 | ENST00000265433.8 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NBN | ENST00000265433.8 | c.797C>T | p.Pro266Leu | missense_variant | 7/16 | 1 | NM_002485.5 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00877 AC: 1333AN: 152008Hom.: 20 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00219 AC: 550AN: 251250Hom.: 11 AF XY: 0.00158 AC XY: 214AN XY: 135790
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000884 AC: 1292AN: 1461686Hom.: 21 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000794 AC XY: 577AN XY: 727150
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00878 AC: 1336AN: 152126Hom.: 20 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00800 AC XY: 595AN XY: 74392
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:4Other:1
not provided, no classification provided | reference population | ITMI | Sep 19, 2013 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Oct 11, 2017 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Feb 05, 2014 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The NBN p.Pro266Leu variant was identified in 14 of 2874 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.005) from individuals or families with various types of cancer and was present in 4 of 1362 control chromosomes (frequency: 0.003) from healthy individuals (Berg 2013, Bodian 2014, Desjardins 2009, Yurgelun 2015). The variant was also identified in the following databases: dbSNP (ID: rs769420) as "With Benign allele", ClinVar (5x benign), Clinvitae (4x benign), and the Zhejiang Colon Cancer Database (1x). The variant was not identified in Cosmic or the LOVD 3.0 database. The variant was identified in control databases in 771 of 276952 chromosomes (11 homozygous) at a frequency of 0.003 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). Breakdown of the observations by population include African in 705 of 24006 chromosomes (freq: 0.03), Other in 5 of 6454 chromosomes (freq: 0.0008), Latino in 44 of 34382 chromosomes (freq: 0.001), European in 4 of 126556 chromosomes (freq: 0.00003), East Asian in 9 of 18864 chromosomes (freq: 0.0005), and South Asian in 4 of 30776 chromosomes (freq: 0.0001). The variant was not observed in the Ashkenazi Jewish or Finnish populations. Various studies utilizing computational algorithms, personal disease history, and family disease history have been performed; most of these studies conclude the variant is not associated with cancer (Berg 2013, Berardinelli 2013, Bodian 2014, Desjardins 2009, Gao 2013, Yurgelun 2015). The p.Pro266 residue is conserved in mammals but not in more distantly related organisms, and four out of five computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) suggest that the leucine variant may impact the protein; however, this information is not predictive enough to assume pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Oct 28, 2020 | - - |
not provided Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | May 01, 2024 | NBN: BP4, BS1, BS2 - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics | Dec 30, 2016 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Jul 23, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Microcephaly, normal intelligence and immunodeficiency Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Nov 12, 2019 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 28, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to rule this variant out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | True Health Diagnostics | Feb 20, 2018 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Dec 12, 2014 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | May 21, 2020 | - - |
Aplastic anemia;C0023449:Acute lymphoid leukemia;C0398791:Microcephaly, normal intelligence and immunodeficiency Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | Oct 07, 2021 | - - |
Acute lymphoid leukemia Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center | Jul 07, 2023 | - - |
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | National Health Laboratory Service, Universitas Academic Hospital and University of the Free State | Apr 19, 2022 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at