8-89980789-T-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1

The NM_002485.5(NBN):ā€‹c.425A>Gā€‹(p.Asn142Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000211 in 1,613,620 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.00033 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š‘“: 0.00020 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

NBN
NM_002485.5 missense

Scores

19

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:6B:7O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.114
Variant links:
Genes affected
NBN (HGNC:7652): (nibrin) Mutations in this gene are associated with Nijmegen breakage syndrome, an autosomal recessive chromosomal instability syndrome characterized by microcephaly, growth retardation, immunodeficiency, and cancer predisposition. The encoded protein is a member of the MRE11/RAD50 double-strand break repair complex which consists of 5 proteins. This gene product is thought to be involved in DNA double-strand break repair and DNA damage-induced checkpoint activation. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.05121094).
BP6
Variant 8-89980789-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr8-89980789-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 127871.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=6, Benign=1, not_provided=1, Uncertain_significance=5}.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population mid. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.000198 (290/1461318) while in subpopulation MID AF= 0.00746 (43/5764). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00569. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 155 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position pass quality control queck.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
NBNNM_002485.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.425A>G p.Asn142Ser missense_variant 4/16 ENST00000265433.8 NP_002476.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
NBNENST00000265433.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.425A>G p.Asn142Ser missense_variant 4/161 NM_002485.5 ENSP00000265433 P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000335
AC:
51
AN:
152186
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000121
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00124
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.000288
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0191
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000265
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000955
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000167
AC:
42
AN:
251294
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000184
AC XY:
25
AN XY:
135820
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0000615
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000434
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0000327
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000202
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000326
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000198
AC:
290
AN:
1461318
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000213
AC XY:
155
AN XY:
727018
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000359
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000604
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000232
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000151
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000629
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000335
AC:
51
AN:
152302
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000363
AC XY:
27
AN XY:
74478
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000120
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00124
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.000288
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000265
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000945
Alfa
AF:
0.000139
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000336
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ALSPAC
AF:
0.000259
AC:
1
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000116
AC:
1
ExAC
AF:
0.000132
AC:
16
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000289
AC:
1
AN:
3476
EpiCase
AF:
0.000382
EpiControl
AF:
0.000119

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:6Benign:7Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:2Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoMay 15, 2023In the published literature, this variant has been reported in individuals with breast and/or ovarian cancer (PMIDs: 34646395 (2021) and 26315354 (2015)), chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (PMID: 26979391 (2016)), as well as unaffected individuals (PMID: 24728327 (2014), 24894818 (2014), 26315354 (2015), 31206626 (2019)). The frequency of this variant in the general population, 0.00042 (15/35422 chromosomes (Genome Aggregation Database, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org)), is uninformative in the assessment of its pathogenicity. Analysis of this variant using bioinformatics tools for the prediction of the effect of amino acid changes on protein structure and function yielded predictions that this variant is benign. Based on the available information, we are unable to determine the clinical significance of this variant. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxAug 23, 2020This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 23525077, 26315354, 24728327, 26787654, 24894818, 26979391, 26193622, 12376507, 12427538, 31278556) -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesJun 02, 2017- -
Microcephaly, normal intelligence and immunodeficiency Uncertain:1Benign:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 29, 2024- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabMay 18, 2021- -
not specified Uncertain:1Benign:1Other:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpMay 25, 2024Variant summary: NBN c.425A>G (p.Asn142Ser) results in a conservative amino acid change located in the BRCT domain of the encoded protein sequence. Five of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00018 in 258668 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.00043 within the Latino subpopulation in the gnomAD database. The observed variant frequency within Latino control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 3.44 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in NBN causing Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome phenotype (0.00013). This variant has also been reported in the FLOSSIES database among women older than age 70 who have never had cancer. c.425A>G has been reported in the literature as a non-deleterious variant or a VUS in settings of multigene panel testing among individuals affected with breast and/or ovarian cancer (example, Ramus_2015, Young_2016, Weitzel_2019, Laraqui_2021, deOlivier_2022) and in at least one patient with hypogammaglobulinemia and lymphoma (example: Allain_2023). These report(s) do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. The following publications have been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 36155879, 24728327, 23525077, 34646395, 12376507, 31278556, 26315354, 12427538, 31206626, 26787654, 35534704). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 127871). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. -
not provided, no classification providedreference populationITMISep 19, 2013- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoJun 17, 2015- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Jun 21, 2021- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsOct 19, 2021This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Aplastic anemia;C0023449:Acute lymphoid leukemia;C0398791:Microcephaly, normal intelligence and immunodeficiency Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingFulgent Genetics, Fulgent GeneticsMay 23, 2017- -
Malignant tumor of breast Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-The NBN p.Asn142Ser variant was identified in 4 of 9094 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.0004) from individuals or families with myeloproliferative neoplasms, epithelial ovarian cancer, or breast cancer and in 4 of 8224 control chromosomes (frequency: 0.0005) from healthy individuals (Bodian 2014, Pratz 2016, Ramus 2015, Young 2016). The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs769414) as "With other allele", ClinVar (classified as likely benign by Invitae and GeneDx; and as uncertain significance by Ambry Genetics and four other clinical laboratories), Cosmic (1x in oesophagus), LOVD 3.0 (1x), and Zhejiang University database. The variant was identified in control databases in 47 of 277032 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.0002 (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: European in 24 of 126600 chromosomes (freq: 0.0002), African in 1 of 24028 chromosomes (freq: 0.00004), Other in 7 of 6460 chromosomes (freq: 0.001), Latino in 12 of 34412 chromosomes (freq: 0.0004), Ashkenazi Jewish in 2 of 10148 chromosomes (freq: 0.0002), and South Asian in 1 of 30782 chromosomes (freq: 0.00003); it was not observed in the East Asian or Finnish populations. The p.Asn142 residue is not conserved in mammals and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein; however, this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and 2 of 5 in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) predict a greater than 10% difference in splicing; this is not very predictive of pathogenicity. In summary, based on the above information, the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time. This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance. -
Hereditary cancer Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMendelicsJan 23, 2024- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.054
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.39
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.49
CADD
Benign
12
DANN
Benign
0.91
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.098
T;T;.;.
Eigen
Benign
-0.79
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.68
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.12
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.83
T;T;D;D
M_CAP
Benign
0.0096
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.051
T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.94
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
0.43
N;.;.;.
MutationTaster
Benign
0.66
N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.30
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-1.0
N;N;N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.034
Sift
Benign
0.39
T;T;T;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.84
T;T;.;T
Polyphen
0.13
B;.;.;.
Vest4
0.079
MVP
0.74
MPC
0.057
ClinPred
0.012
T
GERP RS
-1.2
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7
Varity_R
0.031
gMVP
0.13

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.030
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs769414; hg19: chr8-90993017; COSMIC: COSV55377430; COSMIC: COSV55377430; API