9-108898571-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_003640.5(ELP1):c.2294G>A(p.Gly765Glu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.201 in 1,601,350 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 35,513 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_003640.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ELP1 | NM_003640.5 | c.2294G>A | p.Gly765Glu | missense_variant | 22/37 | ENST00000374647.10 | NP_003631.2 | |
ELP1 | NM_001318360.2 | c.1952G>A | p.Gly651Glu | missense_variant | 22/37 | NP_001305289.1 | ||
ELP1 | NM_001330749.2 | c.1247G>A | p.Gly416Glu | missense_variant | 20/35 | NP_001317678.1 | ||
ELP1 | XM_047423991.1 | c.2294G>A | p.Gly765Glu | missense_variant | 22/25 | XP_047279947.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ELP1 | ENST00000374647.10 | c.2294G>A | p.Gly765Glu | missense_variant | 22/37 | 1 | NM_003640.5 | ENSP00000363779 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.259 AC: 39333AN: 151928Hom.: 5943 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.221 AC: 55278AN: 250044Hom.: 6712 AF XY: 0.213 AC XY: 28751AN XY: 135176
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.195 AC: 283107AN: 1449300Hom.: 29563 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.194 AC XY: 139959AN XY: 721712
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.259 AC: 39376AN: 152050Hom.: 5950 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.260 AC XY: 19301AN XY: 74356
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Familial dysautonomia Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Jul 01, 2021 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | May 10, 2017 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mendelics | May 28, 2019 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
not specified Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Jul 08, 2014 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jan 20, 2014 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at