9-110668862-G-A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -5 ACMG points: 0P and 5B. BP4_StrongBS1_Supporting

The NM_005592.4(MUSK):​c.-43G>A variant causes a 5 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000947 in 1,510,240 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00013 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000091 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

MUSK
NM_005592.4 5_prime_UTR

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, single submitter U:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.526

Publications

1 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
MUSK (HGNC:7525): (muscle associated receptor tyrosine kinase) This gene encodes a muscle-specific tyrosine kinase receptor. The encoded protein may play a role in clustering of the acetylcholine receptor in the postsynaptic neuromuscular junction. Mutations in this gene have been associated with congenital myasthenic syndrome. Alternatively spliced transcript variants have been described.[provided by RefSeq, Oct 2009]
MUSK Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • congenital myasthenic syndrome 9
    Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), PanelApp Australia
  • fetal akinesia deformation sequence 1
    Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • postsynaptic congenital myasthenic syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -5 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.68).
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.000131 (20/152270) while in subpopulation EAS AF = 0.00366 (19/5186). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0024. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 15 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
MUSKNM_005592.4 linkc.-43G>A 5_prime_UTR_variant Exon 1 of 15 ENST00000374448.9 NP_005583.1 O15146-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
MUSKENST00000374448.9 linkc.-43G>A 5_prime_UTR_variant Exon 1 of 15 5 NM_005592.4 ENSP00000363571.4 O15146-1
MUSKENST00000416899.7 linkc.-43G>A 5_prime_UTR_variant Exon 1 of 14 5 ENSP00000393608.3 A0A087WSY1
MUSKENST00000189978.10 linkc.-43G>A 5_prime_UTR_variant Exon 1 of 14 5 ENSP00000189978.6 O15146-2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000131
AC:
20
AN:
152152
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00366
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000147
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.000303
AC:
75
AN:
247630
AF XY:
0.000276
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000585
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00379
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00000891
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000667
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000906
AC:
123
AN:
1357970
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
21
AF XY:
0.0000955
AC XY:
65
AN XY:
680716
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
31232
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0000450
AC:
2
AN:
44396
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
25472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00246
AC:
96
AN:
39098
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0000119
AC:
1
AN:
83848
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
53326
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5588
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00000786
AC:
8
AN:
1018062
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000281
AC:
16
AN:
56948
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.501
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
6
11
17
22
28
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Variant carriers
0
4
8
12
16
20
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000131
AC:
20
AN:
152270
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000201
AC XY:
15
AN XY:
74442
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
41556
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
15286
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00366
AC:
19
AN:
5186
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4824
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10608
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000147
AC:
1
AN:
68018
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
2116
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.490
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1
2
4
5
6
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0000454
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000642

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1
Revision: criteria provided, single submitter
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Congenital myasthenic syndrome 9 Uncertain:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.68
CADD
Benign
6.4
DANN
Benign
0.90
PhyloP100
-0.53
PromoterAI
-0.061
Neutral
Mutation Taster
=296/4
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs116884176; hg19: chr9-113431142; COSMIC: COSV51897511; API