9-114407961-G-C
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The ENST00000362057.4(WHRN):āc.1684C>Gā(p.Pro562Ala) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.111 in 1,601,290 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 10,914 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (ā ā ).
Frequency
Genomes: š 0.091 ( 818 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes š: 0.11 ( 10096 hom. )
Consequence
WHRN
ENST00000362057.4 missense
ENST00000362057.4 missense
Scores
5
13
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 5.00
Genes affected
WHRN (HGNC:16361): (whirlin) This gene is thought to function in the organization and stabilization of sterocilia elongation and actin cystoskeletal assembly, based on studies of the related mouse gene. Mutations in this gene have been associated with autosomal recessive non-syndromic deafness and Usher Syndrome. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2016]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0017889142).
BP6
Variant 9-114407961-G-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr9-114407961-G-C is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 45661.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr9-114407961-G-C is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (NFE) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.122 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WHRN | NM_015404.4 | c.1684C>G | p.Pro562Ala | missense_variant | 8/12 | ENST00000362057.4 | NP_056219.3 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WHRN | ENST00000362057.4 | c.1684C>G | p.Pro562Ala | missense_variant | 8/12 | 1 | NM_015404.4 | ENSP00000354623 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0909 AC: 13836AN: 152146Hom.: 817 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
13836
AN:
152146
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0906 AC: 20876AN: 230454Hom.: 1105 AF XY: 0.0890 AC XY: 11071AN XY: 124326
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
20876
AN:
230454
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
11071
AN XY:
124326
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.113 AC: 163180AN: 1449026Hom.: 10096 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.110 AC XY: 79473AN XY: 719476
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
163180
AN:
1449026
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
79473
AN XY:
719476
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0909 AC: 13842AN: 152264Hom.: 818 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0893 AC XY: 6647AN XY: 74452
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
13842
AN:
152264
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
6647
AN XY:
74452
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
TwinsUK
AF:
AC:
466
ALSPAC
AF:
AC:
515
ESP6500AA
AF:
AC:
114
ESP6500EA
AF:
AC:
1049
ExAC
AF:
AC:
9860
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
64
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:8
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jan 24, 2013 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Jun 19, 2009 | - - |
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 31 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Retinitis pigmentosa-deafness syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mendelics | May 28, 2019 | - - |
Usher syndrome type 2D Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
DEOGEN2
Benign
.;.;T
Eigen
Benign
Eigen_PC
Benign
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
D;D;D
MetaRNN
Benign
T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
T
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
.;.;M
MutationTaster
Benign
P;P;P
PrimateAI
Benign
T
PROVEAN
Benign
N;N;N
REVEL
Benign
Sift
Uncertain
D;D;D
Sift4G
Uncertain
D;D;D
Polyphen
0.74, 0.63
.;P;P
Vest4
MPC
0.15
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at