Menu
GeneBe

rs12339210

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_015404.4(WHRN):c.1684C>G(p.Pro562Ala) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.111 in 1,601,290 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 10,914 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.091 ( 818 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.11 ( 10096 hom. )

Consequence

WHRN
NM_015404.4 missense

Scores

4
12

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: 5.00
Variant links:
Genes affected
WHRN (HGNC:16361): (whirlin) This gene is thought to function in the organization and stabilization of sterocilia elongation and actin cystoskeletal assembly, based on studies of the related mouse gene. Mutations in this gene have been associated with autosomal recessive non-syndromic deafness and Usher Syndrome. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2016]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0017889142).
BP6
Variant 9-114407961-G-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr9-114407961-G-C is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 45661.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr9-114407961-G-C is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (NFE) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.122 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
WHRNNM_015404.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.1684C>G p.Pro562Ala missense_variant 8/12 ENST00000362057.4

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
WHRNENST00000362057.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.1684C>G p.Pro562Ala missense_variant 8/121 NM_015404.4 P1Q9P202-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0909
AC:
13836
AN:
152146
Hom.:
817
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0255
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.114
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.104
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.128
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.0177
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0306
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.160
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0728
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.124
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.101
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0906
AC:
20876
AN:
230454
Hom.:
1105
AF XY:
0.0890
AC XY:
11071
AN XY:
124326
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0208
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0810
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.122
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0145
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0343
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.149
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.118
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0976
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.113
AC:
163180
AN:
1449026
Hom.:
10096
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.110
AC XY:
79473
AN XY:
719476
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0206
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0856
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.125
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0141
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0374
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.156
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.124
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.100
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0909
AC:
13842
AN:
152264
Hom.:
818
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0893
AC XY:
6647
AN XY:
74452
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0255
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.104
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.128
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.0178
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.0317
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.160
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.125
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.0998
Alfa
AF:
0.114
Hom.:
798
Bravo
AF:
0.0845
TwinsUK
AF:
0.126
AC:
466
ALSPAC
AF:
0.134
AC:
515
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.0259
AC:
114
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.122
AC:
1049
ExAC
AF:
0.0814
AC:
9860
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0180
AC:
64
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJan 24, 2013This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineJun 19, 2009- -
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 31, 2024- -
Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 31 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Retinitis pigmentosa-deafness syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMendelicsMay 28, 2019- -
Usher syndrome type 2D Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.10
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.58
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.48
Cadd
Benign
19
Dann
Benign
0.97
Eigen
Benign
0.14
Eigen_PC
Benign
0.18
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.90
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.90
D;D;D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0018
T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.1
T
MutationTaster
Benign
0.00063
P;P;P
PrimateAI
Benign
0.35
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-2.2
N;N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.085
Sift
Uncertain
0.012
D;D;D
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.019
D;D;D
Polyphen
0.74, 0.63
.;P;P
Vest4
0.21
MPC
0.15
ClinPred
0.025
T
GERP RS
4.6
Varity_R
0.069
gMVP
0.31

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs12339210; hg19: chr9-117170241; COSMIC: COSV54330685; API