9-116698964-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_012210.4(TRIM32):​c.1222C>T​(p.Arg408Cys) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00166 in 1,614,140 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0011 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0017 ( 3 hom. )

Consequence

TRIM32
NM_012210.4 missense

Scores

4
10
5

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:6B:7O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 4.48
Variant links:
Genes affected
TRIM32 (HGNC:16380): (tripartite motif containing 32) The protein encoded by this gene is a member of the tripartite motif (TRIM) family. The TRIM motif includes three zinc-binding domains, a RING, a B-box type 1 and a B-box type 2, and a coiled-coil region. The protein localizes to cytoplasmic bodies. The protein has also been localized to the nucleus, where it interacts with the activation domain of the HIV-1 Tat protein. The Tat protein activates transcription of HIV-1 genes. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
ASTN2 (HGNC:17021): (astrotactin 2) This gene encodes a protein that is expressed in the brain and may function in neuronal migration, based on functional studies of the related astrotactin 1 gene in human and mouse. A deletion at this locus has been associated with schizophrenia. Multiple transcript variants encoding different proteins have been found for this locus. [provided by RefSeq, May 2010]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.024597973).
BP6
Variant 9-116698964-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr9-116698964-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 100583.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=7, Uncertain_significance=4, not_provided=1}.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00115 (175/152284) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00178 (121/68012). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00152. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 78 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 3 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
TRIM32NM_012210.4 linkc.1222C>T p.Arg408Cys missense_variant Exon 2 of 2 ENST00000450136.2 NP_036342.2 Q13049A0A024R843
ASTN2NM_001365068.1 linkc.2806+26807G>A intron_variant Intron 16 of 22 ENST00000313400.9 NP_001351997.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
TRIM32ENST00000450136.2 linkc.1222C>T p.Arg408Cys missense_variant Exon 2 of 2 1 NM_012210.4 ENSP00000408292.1 Q13049
ASTN2ENST00000313400.9 linkc.2806+26807G>A intron_variant Intron 16 of 22 5 NM_001365068.1 ENSP00000314038.4 O75129-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00116
AC:
176
AN:
152166
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000338
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000916
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00403
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000387
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00124
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00178
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00239
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00149
AC:
374
AN:
250724
Hom.:
1
AF XY:
0.00153
AC XY:
207
AN XY:
135614
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000433
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000463
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00557
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000272
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00154
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0000462
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00200
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00261
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00171
AC:
2505
AN:
1461856
Hom.:
3
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.00167
AC XY:
1212
AN XY:
727226
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000448
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000559
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00578
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.000655
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00133
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0000375
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00187
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00149
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00115
AC:
175
AN:
152284
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00105
AC XY:
78
AN XY:
74434
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000337
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000915
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00403
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.000194
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00124
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00178
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00236
Alfa
AF:
0.00215
Hom.:
3
Bravo
AF:
0.00135
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00108
AC:
4
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00130
AC:
5
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.000454
AC:
2
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00198
AC:
17
ExAC
AF:
0.00143
AC:
173
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00115
AC:
4
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:6Benign:7Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:4Benign:1Other:1
-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Aug 03, 2021
GeneDx
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

Previously reported in one individual with Usher syndrome; however, no second variant in the TRIM32 gene, as would be expected with autosomal recessive inheritance, was detected in this individual (Song et al., 2011); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 22025579, 19349376) -

Mar 01, 2018
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
NEI Ophthalmic Genomics Laboratory, National Institutes of Health
Significance: not provided
Review Status: no classification provided
Collection Method: literature only

- -

-
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

May 21, 2020
Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:4
Jan 28, 2025
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant summary: TRIM32 c.1222C>T (p.Arg408Cys) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Five of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0015 in 250724 control chromosomes in the gnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. The observed variant frequency is approximately 1.19 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in TRIM32 causing Limb-Girdle Muscular Dystrophy, Autosomal Recessive phenotype (0.0013). The variant, c.1222C>T, has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with various phenotypes, however without strong evidence for causality (e.g. Song_2011, Johnson_2019, Watkins_2019). These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Limb-Girdle Muscular Dystrophy, Autosomal Recessive. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. The following publications have been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 29921608, 22025579, 31624253). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 100583). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jun 03, 2024
Athena Diagnostics
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Dec 10, 2017
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Sarcotubular myopathy Uncertain:2
Aug 31, 2021
New York Genome Center
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Apr 27, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -

Bardet-Biedl syndrome 11 Benign:1
Dec 10, 2023
Genomic Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Bardet-Biedl syndrome Benign:1
Jan 27, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.26
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
0.0061
T
BayesDel_noAF
Pathogenic
0.23
CADD
Pathogenic
29
DANN
Pathogenic
1.0
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
0.55
D;D
Eigen
Uncertain
0.46
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.53
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
0.97
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.95
D;.
M_CAP
Uncertain
0.15
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.025
T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
0.20
D
MutationAssessor
Benign
0.90
L;L
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.77
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-2.5
D;D
REVEL
Uncertain
0.52
Sift
Uncertain
0.0010
D;D
Sift4G
Pathogenic
0.0
D;D
Polyphen
1.0
D;D
Vest4
0.72
MVP
0.97
MPC
0.92
ClinPred
0.054
T
GERP RS
5.5
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7
Varity_R
0.39
gMVP
0.75

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs3747835; hg19: chr9-119461243; API