9-21970917-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -18 ACMG points: 2P and 20B. PM1BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_000077.5(CDKN2A):c.442G>A(p.Ala148Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0244 in 1,612,214 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 600 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000077.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -18 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDKN2A | NM_000077.5 | c.442G>A | p.Ala148Thr | missense_variant | 2/3 | ENST00000304494.10 | NP_000068.1 | |
CDKN2A | NM_058195.4 | c.*86G>A | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 2/3 | ENST00000579755.2 | NP_478102.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDKN2A | ENST00000304494.10 | c.442G>A | p.Ala148Thr | missense_variant | 2/3 | 1 | NM_000077.5 | ENSP00000307101 | P2 | |
CDKN2A | ENST00000579755.2 | c.*86G>A | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 2/3 | 1 | NM_058195.4 | ENSP00000462950 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0197 AC: 2999AN: 152224Hom.: 45 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0209 AC: 5159AN: 246916Hom.: 87 AF XY: 0.0219 AC XY: 2935AN XY: 134074
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0249 AC: 36385AN: 1459872Hom.: 555 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0249 AC XY: 18099AN XY: 726302
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0197 AC: 2999AN: 152342Hom.: 45 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0195 AC XY: 1452AN XY: 74504
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:9Other:1
not provided, no classification provided | reference population | ITMI | Sep 19, 2013 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Nov 29, 2012 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital | Aug 15, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Sep 11, 2013 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Apr 17, 2020 | - - |
not provided Benign:4
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | research | Biesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of Health | Jul 13, 2012 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Oct 11, 2023 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Nov 25, 2014 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Mar 21, 2016 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | May 10, 2020 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | True Health Diagnostics | Feb 20, 2018 | - - |
Melanoma-pancreatic cancer syndrome Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center | Jul 07, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Myriad Genetics, Inc. | Apr 20, 2023 | This variant is considered benign. This variant has been observed at a population frequency that is significantly greater than expected given the associated disease prevalence and penetrance. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | Jun 13, 2016 | - - |
Familial melanoma Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at