9-4701962-G-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM2BP4_Strong
The NM_017913.4(CDC37L1):c.846G>A(p.Met282Ile) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000954 in 1,572,740 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. M282V) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_017913.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_017913.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDC37L1 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.846G>A | p.Met282Ile | missense | Exon 6 of 7 | ENSP00000371278.3 | Q7L3B6 | ||
| CDC37L1 | c.786G>A | p.Met262Ile | missense | Exon 6 of 7 | ENSP00000576284.1 | ||||
| CDC37L1 | TSL:5 | c.846G>A | p.Met282Ile | missense | Exon 6 of 7 | ENSP00000371282.1 | B1AL69 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000132 AC: 2AN: 151986Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00000912 AC: 2AN: 219290 AF XY: 0.00000837 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000915 AC: 13AN: 1420754Hom.: 0 Cov.: 28 AF XY: 0.00000707 AC XY: 5AN XY: 707002 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000132 AC: 2AN: 151986Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000269 AC XY: 2AN XY: 74214 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at