9-69857903-T-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points: 0P and 16B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS2
The NM_001010940.3(CFAP95):c.381-6T>C variant causes a splice region, splice polypyrimidine tract, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00049 in 1,613,190 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 5 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001010940.3 splice_region, splice_polypyrimidine_tract, intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CFAP95 | NM_001010940.3 | c.381-6T>C | splice_region_variant, splice_polypyrimidine_tract_variant, intron_variant | ENST00000377197.8 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CFAP95 | ENST00000377197.8 | c.381-6T>C | splice_region_variant, splice_polypyrimidine_tract_variant, intron_variant | 1 | NM_001010940.3 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00274 AC: 417AN: 152232Hom.: 2 Cov.: 34
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000622 AC: 156AN: 250614Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000399 AC XY: 54AN XY: 135464
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000255 AC: 373AN: 1460840Hom.: 3 Cov.: 29 AF XY: 0.000224 AC XY: 163AN XY: 726728
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00274 AC: 418AN: 152350Hom.: 2 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.00232 AC XY: 173AN XY: 74508
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Dec 28, 2017 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at