9-95468896-G-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -5 ACMG points: 0P and 5B. BP6BS2
The NM_000264.5(PTCH1):c.2105C>G(p.Pro702Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000347 in 1,614,040 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. P702L) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000264.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- basal cell nevus syndrome 1Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: G2P
- holoprosencephaly 7Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
- nevoid basal cell carcinoma syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet
- holoprosencephalyInheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Illumina
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -5 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_000264.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PTCH1 | NM_000264.5 | MANE Select | c.2105C>G | p.Pro702Arg | missense | Exon 14 of 24 | NP_000255.2 | ||
| PTCH1 | NM_001083603.3 | MANE Plus Clinical | c.2102C>G | p.Pro701Arg | missense | Exon 14 of 24 | NP_001077072.1 | ||
| PTCH1 | NM_001354918.2 | c.1949C>G | p.Pro650Arg | missense | Exon 13 of 23 | NP_001341847.1 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PTCH1 | ENST00000331920.11 | TSL:5 MANE Select | c.2105C>G | p.Pro702Arg | missense | Exon 14 of 24 | ENSP00000332353.6 | ||
| PTCH1 | ENST00000437951.6 | TSL:5 MANE Plus Clinical | c.2102C>G | p.Pro701Arg | missense | Exon 14 of 24 | ENSP00000389744.2 | ||
| PTCH1 | ENST00000429896.6 | TSL:1 | c.1652C>G | p.Pro551Arg | missense | Exon 14 of 24 | ENSP00000414823.2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000263 AC: 4AN: 152156Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000159 AC: 4AN: 251422 AF XY: 0.00000736 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000356 AC: 52AN: 1461884Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000261 AC XY: 19AN XY: 727240 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000263 AC: 4AN: 152156Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000135 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74320 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:2
In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Observed in an individual with colon cancer, however additional information as not provided (Chan et al., 2018); Observed in an individual with lung adenocarcinoma who also harbored variants in other cancer related genes (Donner eta l., 2018); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 30093976, 30032850)
The PTCH1 c.2105C>G (p.Pro702Arg) variant has been reported in the published literature in individuals with breast and/or ovarian cancer (PMID: 27153395 (2016)), colon cancer (PMID: 30093976 (2018)), and lung adenocarcinoma (PMID: 30032850 (2018)). The frequency of this variant in the general population, 0.000016 (4/251422 chromosomes (Genome Aggregation Database, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org)), is uninformative in the assessment of its pathogenicity. Analysis of this variant using bioinformatics tools for the prediction of the effect of amino acid changes on protein structure and function yielded predictions that this variant is damaging. Based on the available information, we are unable to determine the clinical significance of this variant.
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:1
This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity.
PTCH1-related disorder Uncertain:1
The PTCH1 c.2105C>G variant is predicted to result in the amino acid substitution p.Pro702Arg. This variant was reported in an individual with lung adenocarcinoma and an individual with colon cancer (Table 3, Donner et al 2018. PubMed ID: 30032850; Supplementary Table 2, Chan et al. 2018. PubMed ID: 30093976). This variant is reported in 0.0058% of alleles in individuals of Latino descent in gnomAD. In ClinVar, this variant has conflicting interpretations ranging from benign to uncertain (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/183062/). At this time, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain due to the absence of conclusive functional and genetic evidence.
Basal cell nevus syndrome 1 Uncertain:1
The PTCH1 c.2105C>G p.(Pro702Arg) missense change has a maximum subpopulation frequency of 0.006% in gnomAD v2.1.1 (https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/). The in silico tool REVEL is inconclusive about a pathogenic or benign effect of this variant on protein function, and to our knowledge functional studies have not been performed. To our knowledge, this variant has not been reported in individuals with nevoid basal cell carcinoma syndrome. In summary, the evidence currently available is insufficient to determine the clinical significance of this variant. It has therefore been classified as of uncertain significance.
Gorlin syndrome Benign:1
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at