ENST00000300589.6:c.13G>C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6_ModerateBS1BS2
The ENST00000300589.6(NOD2):c.13G>C(p.Gly5Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000764 in 1,558,032 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 17/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. G5C) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
ENST00000300589.6 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- Blau syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet, Genomics England PanelApp, G2P, Illumina, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- inflammatory bowel disease 1Inheritance: Unknown Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NOD2 | NM_001370466.1 | c.-8-2232G>C | intron_variant | Intron 1 of 11 | ENST00000647318.2 | NP_001357395.1 |
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000348 AC: 53AN: 152192Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.000119 AC: 20AN: 167788 AF XY: 0.0000451 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000469 AC: 66AN: 1405840Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000375 AC XY: 26AN XY: 694102 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000348 AC: 53AN: 152192Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000269 AC XY: 20AN XY: 74346 show subpopulations
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Regional enteritis;C5201146:Blau syndrome Benign:1
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at