ENST00000382264.7:c.853G>A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The ENST00000382264.7(IFNAR2):c.853G>A(p.Ala285Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.358 in 718,052 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 48,370 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/17 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
ENST00000382264.7 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- immunodeficiency 45Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes  0.350  AC: 53109AN: 151582Hom.:  9511  Cov.: 30 show subpopulations 
GnomAD2 exomes  AF:  0.387  AC: 54809AN: 141474 AF XY:  0.388   show subpopulations 
GnomAD4 exome  AF:  0.360  AC: 203625AN: 566350Hom.:  38838  Cov.: 5 AF XY:  0.364  AC XY: 111628AN XY: 306336 show subpopulations 
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome  0.351  AC: 53174AN: 151702Hom.:  9532  Cov.: 30 AF XY:  0.359  AC XY: 26619AN XY: 74068 show subpopulations 
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified    Benign:2 
This variant is classified as Benign based on local population frequency. This variant was detected in 64% of patients studied by a panel of primary immunodeficiencies. Number of patients: 61. Only high quality variants are reported. -
Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: MAF -
not provided    Benign:1 
- -
Computational scores
Source: 
Splicing
 Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at