ENST00000477039.5:n.100C>T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6_ModerateBS1BS2

The ENST00000477039.5(PPARG):​n.100C>T variant causes a non coding transcript exon change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000349 in 1,556,594 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 5 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00015 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00037 ( 5 hom. )

Consequence

PPARG
ENST00000477039.5 non_coding_transcript_exon

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, single submitter B:3

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.229

Publications

0 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
PPARG (HGNC:9236): (peroxisome proliferator activated receptor gamma) This gene encodes a member of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) subfamily of nuclear receptors. PPARs form heterodimers with retinoid X receptors (RXRs) and these heterodimers regulate transcription of various genes. Three subtypes of PPARs are known: PPAR-alpha, PPAR-delta, and PPAR-gamma. The protein encoded by this gene is PPAR-gamma and is a regulator of adipocyte differentiation. Additionally, PPAR-gamma has been implicated in the pathology of numerous diseases including obesity, diabetes, atherosclerosis and cancer. Alternatively spliced transcript variants that encode different isoforms have been described. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
PPARG Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • PPARG-related familial partial lipodystrophy
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet, Ambry Genetics, G2P, Genomics England PanelApp
  • Berardinelli-Seip congenital lipodystrophy
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.59).
BP6
Variant 3-12351571-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr3-12351571-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 342919.Status of the report is criteria_provided_single_submitter, 1 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.000151 (23/152312) while in subpopulation SAS AF = 0.00456 (22/4828). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00308. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 19 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 5 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
PPARGNM_138711.6 linkc.-8-28133C>T intron_variant Intron 2 of 7 ENST00000651735.1 NP_619725.3 P37231E9PFV2D2KUA6

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
PPARGENST00000651735.1 linkc.-8-28133C>T intron_variant Intron 2 of 7 NM_138711.6 ENSP00000498313.1 E9PFV2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000151
AC:
23
AN:
152194
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000241
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00455
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.000754
AC:
189
AN:
250608
AF XY:
0.000945
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00000883
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000164
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000370
AC:
520
AN:
1404282
Hom.:
5
Cov.:
28
AF XY:
0.000531
AC XY:
373
AN XY:
702110
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
32284
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
44640
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
25838
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39380
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00565
AC:
481
AN:
85080
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
53032
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.000352
AC:
2
AN:
5674
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00000660
AC:
7
AN:
1059842
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000513
AC:
30
AN:
58512
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.471
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
28
56
83
111
139
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
10
20
30
40
50
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000151
AC:
23
AN:
152312
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000255
AC XY:
19
AN XY:
74478
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0000241
AC:
1
AN:
41566
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
15296
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5188
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00456
AC:
22
AN:
4828
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10612
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
68034
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.503
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1
2
3
4
5
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0000572
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000227
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00144
AC:
5
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:3
Revision: criteria provided, single submitter
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

INSULIN RESISTANCE, DIGENIC Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Obesity Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

PPARG-related familial partial lipodystrophy Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.59
CADD
Benign
17
DANN
Benign
0.86
PhyloP100
0.23
PromoterAI
-0.036
Neutral
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs200479885; hg19: chr3-12393070; API