ENST00000536787.2:n.260C>T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4_ModerateBA1
The ENST00000536787.2(APOOP3):n.260C>T variant causes a non coding transcript exon change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.58 in 416,078 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 74,778 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar.
Frequency
Consequence
ENST00000536787.2 non_coding_transcript_exon
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -10 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: ENST00000536787.2. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
There are no transcript annotations for this variant. | |||||||||
Ensembl Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| APOOP3 | ENST00000536787.2 | TSL:6 | n.260C>T | non_coding_transcript_exon | Exon 1 of 1 | ||||
| ENSG00000289319 | ENST00000844184.1 | n.164-11897G>A | intron | N/A |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.563 AC: 85490AN: 151912Hom.: 26568 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.590 AC: 155747AN: 264048Hom.: 48211 Cov.: 0 AF XY: 0.591 AC XY: 89568AN XY: 151640 show subpopulations ⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Exomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5.
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.562 AC: 85514AN: 152030Hom.: 26567 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.567 AC XY: 42151AN XY: 74308 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at