ENST00000602964.1:n.7383C>T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_StrongBA1
The ENST00000602964.1(CARMN):n.7383C>T variant causes a non coding transcript exon change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.331 in 151,962 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 10,294 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar.
Frequency
Consequence
ENST00000602964.1 non_coding_transcript_exon
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: ENST00000602964.1. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CARMN | NR_105059.1 | n.728-1220C>T | intron | N/A | |||||
| CARMN | NR_105060.1 | n.664-1220C>T | intron | N/A |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CARMN | ENST00000602964.1 | TSL:2 | n.7383C>T | non_coding_transcript_exon | Exon 2 of 2 | ||||
| CARMN | ENST00000505254.6 | TSL:5 | n.3149-210C>T | intron | N/A | ||||
| CARMN | ENST00000602315.3 | TSL:5 | n.657-1220C>T | intron | N/A |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.331 AC: 50215AN: 151788Hom.: 10290 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.407 AC: 22AN: 54Hom.: 5 Cov.: 0 AF XY: 0.370 AC XY: 17AN XY: 46 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.331 AC: 50221AN: 151908Hom.: 10289 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.327 AC XY: 24263AN XY: 74222 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at