ENST00000640298.3:c.-1187C>T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -8 ACMG points: 0P and 8B. BP4_StrongBS2
The ENST00000640298.3(RHOXF1P3):c.-1187C>T variant causes a 5 prime UTR premature start codon gain change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000561 in 1,069,153 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. There are 4 hemizygotes in GnomAD. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar.
Frequency
Consequence
ENST00000640298.3 5_prime_UTR_premature_start_codon_gain
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- intellectual developmental disorder, X-linked, syndromic, Hackmann-Di Donato typeInheritance: XL Classification: STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -8 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: ENST00000640298.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RHOXF1P3 | TSL:5 | c.-1187C>T | 5_prime_UTR_premature_start_codon_gain | Exon 1 of 5 | ENSP00000515421.1 | A0A994J3T1 | |||
| NKAP | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.16G>A | p.Gly6Ser | missense | Exon 1 of 9 | ENSP00000360464.3 | Q8N5F7 | ||
| RHOXF1P3 | TSL:5 | c.-1187C>T | 5_prime_UTR | Exon 1 of 5 | ENSP00000515421.1 | A0A994J3T1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 23
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00000661 AC: 1AN: 151268 AF XY: 0.0000205 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000561 AC: 6AN: 1069153Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000116 AC XY: 4AN XY: 344299 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 23
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at