NM_000015.3:c.590G>T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 4 ACMG points: 4P and 0B. PM2PP3_Moderate
The NM_000015.3(NAT2):c.590G>T(p.Arg197Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000000684 in 1,460,956 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. 12/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R197Q) has been classified as Benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000015.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 4 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_000015.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NAT2 | NM_000015.3 | MANE Select | c.590G>T | p.Arg197Leu | missense | Exon 2 of 2 | NP_000006.2 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NAT2 | ENST00000286479.4 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.590G>T | p.Arg197Leu | missense | Exon 2 of 2 | ENSP00000286479.3 | ||
| NAT2 | ENST00000520116.1 | TSL:3 | c.200G>T | p.Arg67Leu | missense | Exon 2 of 2 | ENSP00000428416.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 31
GnomAD4 exome AF: 6.84e-7 AC: 1AN: 1460956Hom.: 0 Cov.: 48 AF XY: 0.00000138 AC XY: 1AN XY: 726726 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 31
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at