NM_000017.4:c.38C>T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -1 ACMG points: 3P and 4B. PM2PP2BP4_Strong
The NM_000017.4(ACADS):c.38C>T(p.Ala13Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000579 in 1,553,536 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000017.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- short chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiencyInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, ClinGen, Orphanet, G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -1 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_000017.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACADS | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.38C>T | p.Ala13Val | missense | Exon 1 of 10 | ENSP00000242592.4 | P16219 | ||
| ACADS | c.38C>T | p.Ala13Val | missense | Exon 1 of 10 | ENSP00000616618.1 | ||||
| ACADS | c.38C>T | p.Ala13Val | missense | Exon 1 of 10 | ENSP00000563678.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000658 AC: 1AN: 151938Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000193 AC: 3AN: 155598 AF XY: 0.0000346 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000571 AC: 8AN: 1401598Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000101 AC XY: 7AN XY: 694388 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000658 AC: 1AN: 151938Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 74202 show subpopulations
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at