NM_000035.4:c.*505C>A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_000035.4(ALDOB):c.*505C>A variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0809 in 220,578 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 873 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000035.4 3_prime_UTR
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALDOB | NM_000035.4 | c.*505C>A | 3_prime_UTR_variant | Exon 9 of 9 | ENST00000647789.2 | NP_000026.2 |
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0793 AC: 12056AN: 152120Hom.: 542 Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0849 AC: 5801AN: 68340Hom.: 331 Cov.: 0 AF XY: 0.0860 AC XY: 3100AN XY: 36056
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0792 AC: 12054AN: 152238Hom.: 542 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0783 AC XY: 5831AN XY: 74428
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Hereditary fructosuria Benign:1
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
not provided Benign:1
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at