NM_000038.6:c.3578A>C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points: 2P and 8B. PM2BP4_StrongBS2

The NM_000038.6(APC):​c.3578A>C​(p.Gln1193Pro) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000342 in 1,461,824 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).

Frequency

Genomes: not found (cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0000034 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

APC
NM_000038.6 missense

Scores

19

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, single submitter U:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.70
Variant links:
Genes affected
APC (HGNC:583): (APC regulator of WNT signaling pathway) This gene encodes a tumor suppressor protein that acts as an antagonist of the Wnt signaling pathway. It is also involved in other processes including cell migration and adhesion, transcriptional activation, and apoptosis. Defects in this gene cause familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), an autosomal dominant pre-malignant disease that usually progresses to malignancy. Mutations in the APC gene have been found to occur in most colorectal cancers, where disease-associated mutations tend to be clustered in a small region designated the mutation cluster region (MCR) and result in a truncated protein product. [provided by RefSeq, Jun 2022]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points.

PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.054547787).
BS2
High AC in GnomAdExome4 at 5 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
APCNM_000038.6 linkc.3578A>C p.Gln1193Pro missense_variant Exon 16 of 16 ENST00000257430.9 NP_000029.2 P25054-1Q4LE70

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
APCENST00000257430.9 linkc.3578A>C p.Gln1193Pro missense_variant Exon 16 of 16 5 NM_000038.6 ENSP00000257430.4 P25054-1
ENSG00000258864ENST00000520401.1 linkn.228+10200A>C intron_variant Intron 3 of 7 3 ENSP00000454861.1 H3BNH8

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
Cov.:
32
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00000342
AC:
5
AN:
1461824
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00000275
AC XY:
2
AN XY:
727216
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0000937
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 genome
Cov.:
32

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1
Revision: criteria provided, single submitter
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Familial adenomatous polyposis 1 Uncertain:1
Jul 11, 2021
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with APC-related conditions. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function output the following: SIFT: "Tolerated"; PolyPhen-2: "Benign"; Align-GVGD: "Class C0". The proline amino acid residue is found in multiple mammalian species, which suggests that this missense change does not adversely affect protein function. This variant is not present in population databases (ExAC no frequency). This sequence change replaces glutamine with proline at codon 1193 of the APC protein (p.Gln1193Pro). The glutamine residue is weakly conserved and there is a moderate physicochemical difference between glutamine and proline. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.040
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
0.000085
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.24
CADD
Benign
17
DANN
Benign
0.79
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.36
T;T;T
Eigen
Benign
-0.50
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.27
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.32
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.79
.;T;T
M_CAP
Benign
0.077
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.055
T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.83
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
-1.9
N;N;.
PrimateAI
Benign
0.33
T
PROVEAN
Benign
0.030
N;N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.29
Sift
Benign
1.0
T;T;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.43
T;T;T
Polyphen
0.0
B;B;.
Vest4
0.14
MutPred
0.19
Gain of relative solvent accessibility (P = 0.0275);Gain of relative solvent accessibility (P = 0.0275);Gain of relative solvent accessibility (P = 0.0275);
MVP
0.52
ClinPred
0.079
T
GERP RS
2.8
Varity_R
0.15
gMVP
0.45

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

No publications associated with this variant yet.

Other links and lift over

hg19: chr5-112174869; API