NM_000051.4:c.7825A>G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 0 ACMG points: 2P and 2B. PM2BP4_Moderate
The NM_000051.4(ATM):āc.7825A>Gā(p.Ile2609Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000248 in 1,613,454 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 17/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. I2609T) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000051.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 0 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_000051.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATM | MANE Select | c.7825A>G | p.Ile2609Val | missense | Exon 53 of 63 | ENSP00000501606.1 | Q13315 | ||
| ATM | TSL:1 | c.7825A>G | p.Ile2609Val | missense | Exon 54 of 64 | ENSP00000388058.2 | Q13315 | ||
| C11orf65 | TSL:1 | c.*1270-1231T>C | intron | N/A | ENSP00000483537.1 | Q8NCR3-1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00000399 AC: 1AN: 250676 AF XY: 0.00 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000205 AC: 3AN: 1461126Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00000275 AC XY: 2AN XY: 726896 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000656 AC: 1AN: 152328Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000134 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74488 show subpopulations
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at