NM_000051.4:c.8215C>A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely pathogenic. The variant received 8 ACMG points: 8P and 0B. PM1PM2PP3_Strong
The NM_000051.4(ATM):c.8215C>A(p.Leu2739Met) variant causes a missense change. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. L2739L) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000051.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_pathogenic. The variant received 8 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_000051.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATM | NM_000051.4 | MANE Select | c.8215C>A | p.Leu2739Met | missense | Exon 56 of 63 | NP_000042.3 | ||
| ATM | NM_001351834.2 | c.8215C>A | p.Leu2739Met | missense | Exon 57 of 64 | NP_001338763.1 | |||
| C11orf65 | NM_001330368.2 | c.641-26837G>T | intron | N/A | NP_001317297.1 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATM | ENST00000675843.1 | MANE Select | c.8215C>A | p.Leu2739Met | missense | Exon 56 of 63 | ENSP00000501606.1 | ||
| ATM | ENST00000452508.7 | TSL:1 | c.8215C>A | p.Leu2739Met | missense | Exon 57 of 64 | ENSP00000388058.2 | ||
| ATM | ENST00000527805.6 | TSL:1 | n.*3279C>A | non_coding_transcript_exon | Exon 54 of 61 | ENSP00000435747.2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 31
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at