NM_000059.4:c.794-11T>C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_Strong
The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):c.794-11T>C variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000227 in 1,586,948 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000059.4 intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA2 | ENST00000380152.8 | c.794-11T>C | intron_variant | Intron 9 of 26 | 5 | NM_000059.4 | ENSP00000369497.3 | |||
BRCA2 | ENST00000530893.7 | c.425-11T>C | intron_variant | Intron 9 of 26 | 1 | ENSP00000499438.2 | ||||
BRCA2 | ENST00000614259.2 | n.794-11T>C | intron_variant | Intron 8 of 25 | 2 | ENSP00000506251.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000197 AC: 3AN: 152256Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000289 AC: 7AN: 242116Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000381 AC XY: 5AN XY: 131210
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000230 AC: 33AN: 1434692Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.0000294 AC XY: 21AN XY: 714486
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000197 AC: 3AN: 152256Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000269 AC XY: 2AN XY: 74388
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 Uncertain:1Benign:3
- -
- -
- -
- -
not provided Benign:4
- -
- -
- -
The BRCA2, EXON10, c.794-11T>C, variant was identified in at least one breast and/or ovarian cancer family from a cohort of 1800 unrelated probands (Brandao 2011). The variant was also identified in the UMD (1X as an unclassified variant) and in the BIC database (3X with unknown clinical importance). The c.794-11T>C variant is located in the 3' splice region but does not affect the invariant -1 and -2 positions. However, positions -3 and -5 to -12 are part of the splicing consensus sequence and variants involving these positions sometimes affect splicing. One functional study using RT-PCR analysis demonstrated no effect of the variant on splicing (Brandao 2011). In addition, in silico or computational prediction software (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, HumanSpliceFinder) does not predict a difference in splicing all four programs. Furthermore, this variant was identified by our laboratory in an individual with a co-occurring pathogenic mutation in BRCA1, increasing the likelihood that the c.794-11T>C variant does not have clinical importance. In summary, based on the above information, the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as predicted benign. -
not specified Benign:3
This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
- -
Variant summary: BRCA2 c.794-11T>C alters a non-conserved nucleotide located close to a canonical splice site and therefore could affect mRNA splicing, leading to a significantly altered protein sequence. 4/4 computational tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. This is supported by functional studies that have reported no impact on splicing (example, Houdayer_2012). The variant allele was found at a frequency of 2.9e-05 in 242116 control chromosomes. The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. c.794-11T>C has been reported in the literature as a VUS in settings of multigene panel testing of individuals affected with breast and/or colorectal cancer (example, Brandao_2011, Djursby_2020). These report(s) do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome. Multiple co-occurrences with other pathogenic variant(s) have been reported in the UMD database and observed at our laboratory (UMD - BRCA1 c.2649insGGCA, p.Thr884AlafsX20; BRCA1 c.5106delA, p.Lys1702AsnfsX4; Our laboratory - BRCA1 c.5266dupC, p.Gln1756fsX74), providing supporting evidence for a benign role. Six clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. All laboratories classified the variant as benign (n=2)/likely benign (n=4). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
- -
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:1
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at