NM_000069.3:c.4752G>A

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -8 ACMG points: 0P and 8B. BP4_ModerateBP6BP7BS1

The NM_000069.3(CACNA1S):c.4752G>A(p.Leu1584Leu) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000177 in 1,613,710 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000059 ( 0 hom., cov: 31)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00019 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

CACNA1S
NM_000069.3 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.373

Publications

0 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

CACNA1S (HGNC:1397): (calcium voltage-gated channel subunit alpha1 S) This gene encodes one of the five subunits of the slowly inactivating L-type voltage-dependent calcium channel in skeletal muscle cells. Mutations in this gene have been associated with hypokalemic periodic paralysis, thyrotoxic periodic paralysis and malignant hyperthermia susceptibility. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

CACNA1S Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

congenital myopathy 18
Inheritance: AD, AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
hypokalemic periodic paralysis, type 1
Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Genomics England PanelApp, Ambry Genetics
malignant hyperthermia, susceptibility to, 5
Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
congenital myopathy
Inheritance: SD, AR, AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Illumina, Genomics England PanelApp
hypokalemic periodic paralysis
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

CACNA1S links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -8 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.43).

BP6

Variant 1-201044373-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-201044373-C-T is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 294713.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.373 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. GnomAdExome4 allele frequency = 0.000189 (276/1461666) while in subpopulation NFE AF = 0.000246 (273/1111938). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000221. There are 1 homozygotes in GnomAdExome4. There are 134 alleles in the male GnomAdExome4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position passed quality control check.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
CACNA1S	NM_000069.3 link	c.4752G>A	p.Leu1584Leu	synonymous_variant	Exon 39 of 44	ENST00000362061.4	NP_000060.2	Q13698
CACNA1S	XM_005245478.4 link	c.4695G>A	p.Leu1565Leu	synonymous_variant	Exon 38 of 43		XP_005245535.1	B1ALM3

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
CACNA1S	ENST00000362061.4 link	c.4752G>A	p.Leu1584Leu	synonymous_variant	Exon 39 of 44	1	NM_000069.3	ENSP00000355192.3		Q13698

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000592

AC:

AN:

152044

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000242

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000118

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.0000438

AC:

AN:

251248

AF XY:

0.0000368

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000968

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000189

AC:

276

AN:

1461666

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000184

AC XY:

134

AN XY:

727112

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

33476

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

44722

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26132

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39692

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

86258

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53296

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5768

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000246

AC:

273

AN:

1111938

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.0000497

AC:

AN:

60384

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.460

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

100

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000592

AC:

AN:

152044

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000404

AC XY:

AN XY:

74268

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0000242

AC:

AN:

41398

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

15272

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5182

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4804

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10616

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

316

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000118

AC:

AN:

67982

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2090

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.536

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000111

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0000642

EpiCase

AF:

0.00

EpiControl

AF:

0.000119

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:1

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Hypokalemic periodic paralysis, type 1

Uncertain:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Malignant hyperthermia, susceptibility to, 5;C3714580:Hypokalemic periodic paralysis, type 1

Benign:1

Oct 03, 2024

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.43

CADD

Benign

9.1

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.83

PhyloP100

0.37

Mutation Taster

=100/0

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.010

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over