NM_000088.4:c.1269C>T

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -8 ACMG points: 0P and 8B. BP4_ModerateBP6BP7BS2

The NM_000088.4(COL1A1):c.1269C>T(p.Pro423Pro) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000322 in 1,613,270 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00018 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00034 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

COL1A1
NM_000088.4 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:10

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.0630

Publications

0 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

COL1A1 (HGNC:2197): (collagen type I alpha 1 chain) This gene encodes the pro-alpha1 chains of type I collagen whose triple helix comprises two alpha1 chains and one alpha2 chain. Type I is a fibril-forming collagen found in most connective tissues and is abundant in bone, cornea, dermis and tendon. Mutations in this gene are associated with osteogenesis imperfecta types I-IV, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type VIIA, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome Classical type, Caffey Disease and idiopathic osteoporosis. Reciprocal translocations between chromosomes 17 and 22, where this gene and the gene for platelet-derived growth factor beta are located, are associated with a particular type of skin tumor called dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans, resulting from unregulated expression of the growth factor. Two transcripts, resulting from the use of alternate polyadenylation signals, have been identified for this gene. [provided by R. Dalgleish, Feb 2008]

COL1A1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

Caffey disease
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, ClinGen
combined osteogenesis imperfecta and Ehlers-Danlos syndrome 1
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, ClinGen
Ehlers-Danlos syndrome
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: G2P
Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, arthrochalasia type
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, PanelApp Australia, G2P, Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen
osteogenesis imperfecta type 1
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, ClinGen
osteogenesis imperfecta type 2
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, ClinGen
osteogenesis imperfecta type 3
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet
osteogenesis imperfecta type 4
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: G2P, Orphanet, ClinGen
Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, classic type, 1
Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: ClinGen
Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, classic type
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Ehlers-Danlos/osteogenesis imperfecta syndrome
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
high bone mass osteogenesis imperfecta
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

COL1A1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -8 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.37).

BP6

Variant 17-50195262-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-50195262-G-A is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 456732.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.063 with no splicing effect.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 28 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
COL1A1	NM_000088.4 link	c.1269C>T	p.Pro423Pro	synonymous_variant	Exon 19 of 51	ENST00000225964.10	NP_000079.2	P02452
COL1A1	XM_011524341.2 link	c.1071C>T	p.Pro357Pro	synonymous_variant	Exon 16 of 48		XP_011522643.1
COL1A1	XM_005257058.5 link	c.1269C>T	p.Pro423Pro	synonymous_variant	Exon 19 of 49		XP_005257115.2
COL1A1	XM_005257059.5 link	c.957+1052C>T		intron_variant	Intron 14 of 37		XP_005257116.2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
COL1A1	ENST00000225964.10 link	c.1269C>T	p.Pro423Pro	synonymous_variant	Exon 19 of 51	1	NM_000088.4	ENSP00000225964.6		P02452
COL1A1	ENST00000471344.1 link	n.213C>T		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 3 of 8	2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000184

AC:

AN:

152004

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000966

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000393

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000265

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000282

AC:

AN:

248202

AF XY:

0.000275

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000698

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.0000468

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000376

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000495

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000337

AC:

492

AN:

1461148

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000349

AC XY:

254

AN XY:

726886

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0000299

AC:

AN:

33460

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000628

AC:

AN:

44584

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26088

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.0000756

AC:

AN:

39690

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.0000116

AC:

AN:

86240

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.000131

AC:

AN:

53312

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5758

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000395

AC:

439

AN:

1111664

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000215

AC:

AN:

60352

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.484

Heterozygous variant carriers

102

136

170

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

100

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000184

AC:

AN:

152122

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000175

AC XY:

AN XY:

74372

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0000964

AC:

AN:

41514

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000393

AC:

AN:

15278

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5164

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4824

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10620

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

292

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000265

AC:

AN:

67944

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2104

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.507

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000363

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000257

EpiCase

AF:

0.000491

EpiControl

AF:

0.000596

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:10

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Benign:5

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Aug 15, 2023

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 01, 2019

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nov 04, 2020

GeneDx

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Infantile cortical hyperostosis

Uncertain:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Osteogenesis imperfecta

Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Ehlers-Danlos syndrome

Benign:1

Feb 05, 2021

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, arthrochalasia type

Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Cardiovascular phenotype

Benign:1

Apr 19, 2019

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Osteogenesis imperfecta type I

Benign:1

Jan 29, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.37

CADD

Benign

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.78

PhyloP100

0.063

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over