NM_000093.5:c.2058G>A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_000093.5(COL5A1):​c.2058G>A​(p.Pro686Pro) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00053 in 1,613,560 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 9 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0026 ( 2 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00031 ( 7 hom. )

Consequence

COL5A1
NM_000093.5 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:13

Conservation

PhyloP100: -5.03
Variant links:
Genes affected
COL5A1 (HGNC:2209): (collagen type V alpha 1 chain) This gene encodes an alpha chain for one of the low abundance fibrillar collagens. Fibrillar collagen molecules are trimers that can be composed of one or more types of alpha chains. Type V collagen is found in tissues containing type I collagen and appears to regulate the assembly of heterotypic fibers composed of both type I and type V collagen. This gene product is closely related to type XI collagen and it is possible that the collagen chains of types V and XI constitute a single collagen type with tissue-specific chain combinations. The encoded procollagen protein occurs commonly as the heterotrimer pro-alpha1(V)-pro-alpha1(V)-pro-alpha2(V). Mutations in this gene are associated with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, types I and II. Alternative splicing of this gene results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, May 2013]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.75).
BP6
Variant 9-134765704-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr9-134765704-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 212890.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr9-134765704-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-5.03 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00261 (397/152312) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.00899 (374/41580). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00824. There are 2 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 170 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 397 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
COL5A1NM_000093.5 linkc.2058G>A p.Pro686Pro synonymous_variant Exon 21 of 66 ENST00000371817.8 NP_000084.3 P20908-1A0A024R8E5B2ZZ86Q59EE7
COL5A1NM_001278074.1 linkc.2058G>A p.Pro686Pro synonymous_variant Exon 21 of 66 NP_001265003.1 B2ZZ86Q59EE7
COL5A1XM_017014266.3 linkc.2058G>A p.Pro686Pro synonymous_variant Exon 21 of 65 XP_016869755.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
COL5A1ENST00000371817.8 linkc.2058G>A p.Pro686Pro synonymous_variant Exon 21 of 66 1 NM_000093.5 ENSP00000360882.3 P20908-1
COL5A1ENST00000371820.4 linkc.2058G>A p.Pro686Pro synonymous_variant Exon 21 of 66 2 ENSP00000360885.4 P20908-2H7BY82

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00259
AC:
394
AN:
152194
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00895
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000982
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000882
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000956
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000742
AC:
186
AN:
250686
Hom.:
1
AF XY:
0.000472
AC XY:
64
AN XY:
135546
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00949
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000407
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0000327
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000970
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000982
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000313
AC:
458
AN:
1461248
Hom.:
7
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.000289
AC XY:
210
AN XY:
726918
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00917
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000448
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000252
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000580
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000594
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000961
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00261
AC:
397
AN:
152312
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00228
AC XY:
170
AN XY:
74468
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00899
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000980
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000882
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000946
Alfa
AF:
0.00155
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00304
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000866
AC:
3
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000109
EpiControl
AF:
0.000178

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:13
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:6
-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jul 29, 2014
GeneDx
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jul 21, 2023
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, classic type, 1 Benign:2
Mar 15, 2022
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 15, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Fibromuscular dysplasia, multifocal Benign:1
Mar 15, 2022
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection Benign:1
Apr 02, 2015
Ambry Genetics
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type 7A Benign:1
Jun 14, 2016
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, classic type Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, classic type, 1;C5543412:Fibromuscular dysplasia, multifocal Benign:1
Feb 22, 2022
Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.75
CADD
Benign
1.4
DANN
Benign
0.54

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs143443499; hg19: chr9-137657550; COSMIC: COSV65672862; API