NM_000093.5:c.4892C>T

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PP3_ModerateBS2

The NM_000093.5(COL5A1):c.4892C>T(p.Thr1631Met) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000211 in 1,614,118 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. T1631K) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000013 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000022 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

COL5A1
NM_000093.5 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:5B:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 4.81

Publications

5 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

COL5A1 (HGNC:2209): (collagen type V alpha 1 chain) This gene encodes an alpha chain for one of the low abundance fibrillar collagens. Fibrillar collagen molecules are trimers that can be composed of one or more types of alpha chains. Type V collagen is found in tissues containing type I collagen and appears to regulate the assembly of heterotypic fibers composed of both type I and type V collagen. This gene product is closely related to type XI collagen and it is possible that the collagen chains of types V and XI constitute a single collagen type with tissue-specific chain combinations. The encoded procollagen protein occurs commonly as the heterotrimer pro-alpha1(V)-pro-alpha1(V)-pro-alpha2(V). Mutations in this gene are associated with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, types I and II. Alternative splicing of this gene results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, May 2013]

COL5A1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

Ehlers-Danlos syndrome
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: G2P
Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, classic type
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, Ambry Genetics, ClinGen, Orphanet
Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, classic type, 1
Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
arterial disorder
Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics

COL5A1 links:

LOC101448202 (HGNC:):

LOC101448202 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points.

PP3

MetaRNN computational evidence supports a deleterious effect, 0.848

BS2

High AC in GnomAdExome4 at 32 AD gene.

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_000093.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Gene	Transcript	Tags	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon Rank	Protein	UniProt
COL5A1	NM_000093.5	MANE Select	c.4892C>T	p.Thr1631Met	missense	Exon 62 of 66	NP_000084.3
COL5A1	NM_001278074.1		c.4892C>T	p.Thr1631Met	missense	Exon 62 of 66	NP_001265003.1	P20908-2
LOC101448202	NR_103451.2		n.71-4584G>A		intron	N/A

Ensembl Transcripts

Gene	Transcript	Tags	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon Rank	Protein	UniProt
COL5A1	ENST00000371817.8	TSL:1 MANE Select	c.4892C>T	p.Thr1631Met	missense	Exon 62 of 66	ENSP00000360882.3	P20908-1
COL5A1	ENST00000371820.4	TSL:2	c.4892C>T	p.Thr1631Met	missense	Exon 62 of 66	ENSP00000360885.4	P20908-2
COL5A1	ENST00000950240.1		c.4883C>T	p.Thr1628Met	missense	Exon 62 of 66	ENSP00000620299.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000197

AC:

AN:

152234

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000207

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.0000941

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000147

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.0000160

AC:

AN:

249578

AF XY:

0.0000222

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0000619

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.0000544

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000178

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000219

AC:

AN:

1461766

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000206

AC XY:

AN XY:

727180

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

33480

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

44722

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26136

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.0000504

AC:

AN:

39700

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.0000232

AC:

AN:

86258

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53298

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5768

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000234

AC:

AN:

1112008

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.0000331

AC:

AN:

60396

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.491

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000131

AC:

AN:

152352

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00

AC XY:

AN XY:

74496

show subpopulations

⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Genomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5.

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

41592

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

15308

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3468

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5176

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4828

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.0000941

AC:

AN:

10626

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000147

AC:

AN:

68032

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2116

⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Genomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5. (p-value = 0.00462622), which strongly suggests a high chance of mosaicism in these individuals.

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.358

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.0000271

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0000416

TwinsUK

AF:

0.00

AC:

ALSPAC

AF:

0.000259

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.0000165

AC:

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000289

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

ClinVar submissions

Significance:Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Revision:criteria provided, conflicting classifications

View on ClinVar

Pathogenic

VUS

Benign

Condition

Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, classic type, 1 (2)

not provided (2)

Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, classic type (1)

not specified (1)

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.27

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.058

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.14

CADD

Pathogenic

(source)

DANN

Uncertain

1.0

DEOGEN2

Uncertain

0.63

Eigen

Uncertain

0.59

Eigen_PC

Uncertain

0.48

FATHMM_MKL

Uncertain

0.92

LIST_S2

Uncertain

0.97

M_CAP

Uncertain

0.24

MetaRNN

Pathogenic

0.85

MetaSVM

Uncertain

0.27

MutationAssessor

Pathogenic

3.3

PhyloP100

4.8

PrimateAI

Uncertain

0.76

PROVEAN

Pathogenic

-4.9

REVEL

Uncertain

0.62

Sift

Pathogenic

0.0

Sift4G

Pathogenic

0.0

Polyphen

0.99

Vest4

0.74

MutPred

0.51

Loss of phosphorylation at T1631 (P = 0.0538)

MVP

0.80

MPC

0.31

ClinPred

0.93

GERP RS

3.2

PromoterAI

-0.036

Neutral

(source)

Varity_R

0.82

gMVP

0.90

Mutation Taster

=77/23

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Variant Effect in Transcripts

RefSeq Transcripts

Ensembl Transcripts

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over